Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 13 February 2019 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4149A129441 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48yIvD4NOwzt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC07128D0B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 06:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 77273A06BF; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:33:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 057E2190673; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:28:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:28:51 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Message-ID: <20190213142851.rh2xv66zzdu6voco@sources.org>
References: <20190212083908.w5cwgtmypkjwmqnd@nic.fr> <ecfdb33d-7925-f762-6788-68b7a659a3d8@redbarn.org> <43FF2435-37C6-43B0-B97C-59D23AD2A9C2@virtualized.org> <873fe3e1-58e4-38a7-eb11-37509f9b7ff4@redbarn.org> <D01BFEEE-746D-4F30-A3CE-497D4AFA8CC5@fugue.com> <7cdbd8a8-2bf4-992e-3197-ca17e7352a5b@redbarn.org> <725FD25D-FCE9-4740-A001-79369AFDEB78@fugue.com> <d1f66089-1e78-15f6-269c-33ced12c2738@redbarn.org> <3C1FF728-2F31-4884-B7E9-55DF4E15AEB6@fugue.com> <cb9646e3-676d-c24f-240d-e0c8ed159e88@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <cb9646e3-676d-c24f-240d-e0c8ed159e88@redbarn.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.6
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gCb4fCi4f4fhciESULO_ePN06tY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] extension of DoH to authoritative servers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:33:11 -0000

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:48:36PM -0800,
 Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>; wrote 
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> increased for political reasons.

There is nothing wrong with political reasons. Mass surveillance is a
political problem (privacy). DNS lies by ISPs is a political problem
(network neutrality). It is perfectly normal that IETF develops stuff
for political reasons. (Everybody have read RFC 8280?)

> google, ibm, cloudflare, cisco, and other so-called "public dns"
> providers will at some point choose whether to offer DoH from shared
> addresses, making those shared addresses into risks that the rest of
> us have to manage differently; or whether to dedicate DoH to well
> known addresses that can be outright blocked.

It seems to be an issue with DoC
<https://blog.powerdns.com/2019/02/07/the-big-dns-privacy-debate-at-fosdem/>;,
not really DoH itself.