[DNSOP] Re: AD review of draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19

[tirumal reddy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eric,

I raised a PR
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error/pull/93
to address the comments, please have a look.

Cheers,
-Tiru

On Mon, 25 May 2026 at 12:38, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Tiru,
>
> Thank you for the update.
>
> The added text in section 5.1 indeed addresses my concerns but raises a
> new one about the use of SHOULD without the guidance [1]. This is about the
> 2 SHOULD related to 4 entries, suggest to either use plain "should" or
> remove these parts of the sentence (they do not add a lot of value I think).
>
> Section 5.2 has also 2 SHOULD without the required guidance per IESG
> statement ☹️
>
>    - `the server SHOULD first attempt to reduce`, in this statement a
>    "MUST" is probably more appropriate
>    -  `the server SHOULD populate the "j" `, the consequences should
>    probably be explained "else the user won't be able to read the
>    'human-readable' message' or something similar
>
>
> Thanks in advance for submitting a revised I-D
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/
>
> *From: *tirumal reddy <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Monday, 25 May 2026 at 07:55
> *To: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *Dan Wing <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>; Mohamed Boucadair <[e-mail]>;
> Benno Overeinder <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [DNSOP] Re: AD review of
> draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19
>
> Thanks Eric for the reminder, published revised draft
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-20.html
>
> -Tiru
>
>
>
> *From: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Thursday, 21 May 2026 at 18:20
> *To: *tirumal reddy <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *[e-mail] WG <[e-mail]>; Dan Wing <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Mohamed Boucadair <
> [e-mail]>; Benno Overeinder <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [DNSOP] Re: AD review of
> draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19
>
> Tiru,
>
> Thanks for your patience, I had a look at the PR and it seems good to me.
> So, please merge and resubmit.
>
> This is a big change, but the DNSOP WG will have the opportunity to review
> the revised I-D during the IETF Last Call.
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> *From: *tirumal reddy <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Sunday, 10 May 2026 at 07:19
> *To: *Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *Mukund Sivaraman <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] WG <
> [e-mail]>; Dan Wing <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>; Mohamed Boucadair <[e-mail]>;
> Benno Overeinder <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [DNSOP] Re: AD review of
> draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error-19
>
> I raised a PR
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error/pull/92 to
> address the language issue, please review.
>
> -Tiru
>
> On Sat, 9 May 2026 at 13:06, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
> Mukund,
>
> This is indeed what I would go for, same as Accept 'negotiation' over HTTP
>
> An important change for this I-D though.
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> On 08/05/2026, 19:19, "Mukund Sivaraman" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps a client can indicate its locale in an EDNS option in the query,
> and the server responds with a single localized set of fields matching
> what the client requested, or if that is not available, whatever
> language the server has.
>
> Mukund
>
>