Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 11 August 2017 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0D813268C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jBvEU-a7XaOv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B98513268A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.134] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v7BEo4GD006103 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:50:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [10.32.60.134]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Lanlan Pan <abbypan@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:51:02 -0700
Message-ID: <C4F47741-3842-4251-96F0-484C61DF6258@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH8ntOerB6MGKMS2xcCK3TL9n4fyLq6F+bpUY6oTUpWN8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149908054910.760.8140876567010458934.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANLjSvU23OPMM=cETxBiV7j8UhMzMd426VuivxAtboMAB0=7jw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707031317070.21595@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CANLjSvXE4q9PSEc4txKM4OPKXVpT38N_PC2-fDHmihpk29ahcw@mail.gmail.com> <1197245d-6b9a-3c3b-82a0-dc6a1cc3de58@nic.cz> <CANLjSvVe99q4vtTW0TRopmQ0s9hC8HdMze5B6COs8Y_3unir5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAiTEH8ntOerB6MGKMS2xcCK3TL9n4fyLq6F+bpUY6oTUpWN8w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gE_mvPzBItAqrGcuu4msJ6rxz7M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-pan-dnsop-swild-rr-type-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:51:04 -0000

On 11 Aug 2017, at 7:39, Matthew Pounsett wrote:

> It sounds like you're assuming that SWILD would be supported by caching
> servers that do not support DNSSEC or NSEC aggressive use.  Why do you
> expect implementers would adopt SWILD before adopting these much older
> features?

This is my top question on the document.

--Paul HOffman