Re: [DNSOP] Registry of non-service _prefix names?

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 13 November 2015 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2951B2B0D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZ62-XTTNHSg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC161B2B2C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 119461FD62; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:17:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:17:14 +0100
Message-ID: <ACC608B7-4405-4D11-8E69-130C689C089F@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20151113180033.4668.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <20151113180033.4668.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_C5125A46-4608-45AC-AC0E-9BDF484ED752_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5164)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gLOoA5rOIPzKrE3-4vVpeQfRU28>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Registry of non-service _prefix names?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:17:18 -0000

On 13 Nov 2015, at 19:00, John Levine wrote:

> It's not a substitute for a
> new RRTYPE; they need the prefix whether the data is TXT or a new type.

Clarification, my english is not good enough...

What you mean is that they believe they do need the prefix regardless of what RRType they will use, including TXT?

   Patrik