IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174821B46F3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:34:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtagzebxI9oZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5524E1B46CC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec75 with SMTP id c75so50720117wme.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 21:34:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SMWdnX2FGFbsQ1zJDjvTFk9ffWFRSQzzC9zUupzcXBQ=; b=DnjtSSd5qYadKeLcqagdsjy6zgC4sYoHGgcqPMRRL+e6TuF/TDNqiOFruB6jWCo6M5 BgT0QUR+XoKAS1gsArlvTtXfcvBzJKzd677AKNqhXCFRE83xyIcFV/n7mxcHOsAHQr+t VqPhpzEmric6Si926rInFOaBzIwKw1jpWYmf7JH0vT/5FJKcF58qCaqT2IQokIMkTUB8 9KG1ID86pihd7pFABIHOPZ/bhQdf/ARxdZdHkELTeTSsckNwLEXPoVKKsrA0yd2pGrfV 9WvouzkW6nFNRtIlbdd7Z6e/1sL5Eej2FEORuRL+Q+BG7P9lgKcm//dfqX/4YNLCUQwc BYVA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.178.210 with SMTP id b201mr11429788wmf.78.1446442464514; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 21:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.94.132 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:34:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEFKty_0KKOvqFVpNOQak9jYzX5tVqZCKSTx=urwcUU2vg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151019213107.9834.95181.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAF4+nEGEfL_hk-+K83WuFuVE5UZ0sDiJC7XYpxW0qZcDXuNz1w@mail.gmail.com> <20151024194950.GA7008@sources.org> <CAF4+nEE34U_dF=wXCRGLm8FL8VPe4R4iT49274gyUsf5dRQdTg@mail.gmail.com> <5631B9FC.9030003@gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFKty_0KKOvqFVpNOQak9jYzX5tVqZCKSTx=urwcUU2vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:34:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EVAAf973bsNJYVYh7ZEb0q9ra+OrRk6Cf1dwJA6qcr5A@mail.gmail.com>
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114428a4491e180523882180"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gNL5Ai3t5AhxVqBs87CfIX57V_o>
Cc: "<dnsop@ietf.org>" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 05:34:33 -0000

Thanks Donald,

I'm going to work on the Shepherd writeup and have it out by Thursday.

tim


On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Revised version has been uploaded.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/28/15 7:03 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> >>
> >> OK.  I could produce an updated draft with fixes for those typos to
> >> upload during IETF meeting week but I'm not sure if other changes are
> >> desired.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Donald
> >
> >
> > Please feel free.  We've been through WGLC some time back and we've
> gotten
> > strong consensus, with the editorial caveats that you have addressed. The
> > chairs feel it's ready to be moved along, unless something major appears
> > from this last update.
> >
> > tim
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email