Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8078 (5049)

Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org> Mon, 26 June 2017 11:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rwfranks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9BC129AF9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWCXNCMnu-ix for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76CDC126CD8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p66so52503304oia.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1hf892YXXeJNNIFeeisiatWuc3pzKxqPt1Ho5vJxJ+A=; b=Gtam0OB+pxnI2GhI73D7o+CC5UYfBkvsrXkAHYv0fVOH/bq88TnBn0sVXoVc9mnRWX rzCQPkLMQlquQvSn9WcZvGFevqYeOBNPtOHUeCKeWjHePASbfYmnHaiV043jjSVlroDk 6haxmnijm8bQQmjREK15eXaSoU1oVoY04TCP+2tKukX8gQiXI8WzcxCYz+E75mz9HxUb b+SuqzMbT3SC3M6zb68YdJx4Z7OfTf8LC/nvpk61UCrU9CEXpc/3Y728UJ6nI9OzrCKi Qsr3W+a3jmW/A33LPy2FX5p8HtHwtD+txDLkYT/9mKNHzfUyKrpXbAGWpQafuJtQAWx3 VN5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1hf892YXXeJNNIFeeisiatWuc3pzKxqPt1Ho5vJxJ+A=; b=D0Xdnl/xmlz4ui0xii55OGX8OXCKy94hKN3tqBqA/nxL0ZDOMRQ1pl7/FBvhApxKus jeKAtChMoeWqRV3X1yi9JkUsK8p2gjW7AJD4d3Fk4yCPsSpFbvOjOVXyNFtQh1ubEPTc ymt2ieTy0oSra4+p5GVJOSgdXNEMTA3IkNRtotRXgeT1RZgTXOa4n0DeMyYgVb20DiSG 1zzYVC7E1noTV3Z27SWi09+uLhD3cniXW/3R8vTR5Fsdm7FJufEo8Y5Z4A8v8ZlaULwf AhWNyzBDiDpQB0hlldWnMNw93z0y6csHEpGprF0q08f2Ht3j96Dtb+bWW4IAnc3UVaq4 LkCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwx66p+ry3DkhrTW+DKxXUknQYQqdDx3Fw5oBHNAtgF17Zfn6aw ofHRMcOO8WhxOodsqj2bA7Z5YH2hlA==
X-Received: by 10.202.188.87 with SMTP id m84mr11233651oif.166.1498476605941; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rwfranks@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.232.163 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jun 2017 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM1xaJ9F91s9+O1CtwApdOq_5DorMU3SXSvZajGAdGV1h0oHFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170623105434.22478B810AB@rfc-editor.org> <CAN6NTqyBg74NF-F8imGiK0ArwxAbhc0uE_xXbX-No+Le8E9DUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri7npS57gupPrUc2aGhsg21u8csx+69GKrCFkeQ6H5Dnxw@mail.gmail.com> <9284fde5-ea75-a25a-3aa1-2e521753dc3e@cesnet.cz> <519c2cb0-0239-e28f-e4e8-6dcb13459d3d@pletterpet.nl> <CAM1xaJ9F91s9+O1CtwApdOq_5DorMU3SXSvZajGAdGV1h0oHFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dick Franks <rwfranks@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:29:25 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: RJm2LI9NbC-RGxud47Ptu_AqLWs
Message-ID: <CAKW6Ri6pyCUycdj=i-KjBKRopfRbDUaK4aMnjb6+PJrfw0jXEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFbEjWVsw6Fr?= <jv@fcelda.cz>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w5NsYWZ1ciBHdcOwbXVuZHNzb24=?= <olafur@cloudflare.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Caletka?= <Ondrej.Caletka@cesnet.cz>, Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@pletterpet.nl>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, pwouters@redhat.com, bclaise@cisco.com, Olafur Gudmundsson <olafur+ietf@cloudflare.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dd52acd2e160552db45fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gUni5CBNDNk7sU6hGsZhDS489Vc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8078 (5049)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:30:08 -0000

On 26 June 2017 at 10:59, Jan Včelák <jv@fcelda.cz> wrote:

>8

>
> The implementers should be careful and avoid the trouble. In this
> sense, I think parent zone should accept both zero-length and one-byte
> long digests/keys as a request to remove the DS.
>

Exactly!  The _only_ way to recognise DELETE CDS/CDNSKEY is the zero
algorithm field. RFC8078 says that.  All the rest is mere decoration.