[DNSOP] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 July 2024 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5A6C15106B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GyhdBrrA-dDe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4FBC151087 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58b447c51bfso3142284a12.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720022848; x=1720627648; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eLzLc4JjqRGhJhU1a+QTO/Hg/mc46T6acycWl/qjPhA=; b=DsJuSoQ0cueEJQuuBBMmKEr0nZR8GXmYtso7rDMVD8PkWq82fGuM4maPXF34ivyYI5 7tJg0Y9KU4Q55ZVaaVW+TW6L1+lybHy83Tm5HoQL1I9i4si/IIhaDBd+Vm7GGKytLPe1 TL8KTMWt0yKiueJm4FtDXujsW/XLvhoJogQnlh/JQED6GhSda8zQXggVjcr363Yy3Avf O6lwsFIsl0qXoGyA5MLWOei+PriaDK82PtEbKrBJuDkZR/ARMHefhrL7epZiSU9PVvU+ Tpw5aE0+4Qt+DqzOi3/suHfHgH1t9cyYFpP5Eh0PJVfgVt1VRC6kYyAo9kx9AXI3dLyY vUMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720022848; x=1720627648; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=eLzLc4JjqRGhJhU1a+QTO/Hg/mc46T6acycWl/qjPhA=; b=G53+lFB0xKmevTFtXUWhQXqkySKrYLE/ivSxr7MRkbYXQ8Nhsa1QciRteVR4BZeL7s gHtZv/UZSn0/GXvlDhGfUtk6dXiOoDyxPZGjPLvSDLyeOg7mc6Qi1h34jVZYOuFG6NZB iIzEBK+HTRR/XdQAMsv9qC+dSoTU39jODio26TqTh0h5B7gow6Hhl9CWQng61+8jCmay oFcW/CauevVUpZPE0yjKPX2YjqJMLKavg3Qhu1sm2yPHsrB+IOwDewSBvNmmfyWkA10q HcfPdgW88VivyZcZGHAPZyOuhfU8O6j6j25/3wt+zHqaJ7HJnu0zf2Z11e+gErDPxVf3 CLAg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU+ngBooMdEYN5ujR4vv70augi+dT6+twPu1qIK9GAOwW9AWFBNl92z9sMMk5yjPJU1dcRDa5jX/DGCjAAKWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxiqk6qtZM5mxfirLn68J+QDKfc0eI1cn221xhcP7w+2leVHTz/ tplyDh83NbyusETx3WpKOe009CEd1Wh87T0PQHUG4dkHdAyqPo0vqIVa+GPnyF1z3K7aqdQNWOi l/lPAjzupKZKpYfM5ZSd894najIbNIw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrWACeL44naB/u9bw4IHf7LmPUfZiYTig0QW7u/5u8XGhNbrYyvBsijRwEnOEBBKhKVkG/Hboe5fyRD6buY+s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1ec1:b0:57c:8022:a3db with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5879f0cbe78mr8694433a12.6.1720022847644; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171998741659.882880.10626778952063148507@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj> <CAAObRXKLufcaME_Gh_GaRx1GheJnK5PHkDC6geLrF4wwQXfwtg@mail.gmail.com> <SA1PR15MB43706316B722786376F163A1B3DD2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CAHPuVdWdRRx1d4Hafz_mun09AzURDD+z3E-wX1oWCwJBJNMPYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdWdRRx1d4Hafz_mun09AzURDD+z3E-wX1oWCwJBJNMPYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:07:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EixgL_rGj0j_NJ8yLZ_ZSUDK=j6QNsoSwe=0gM_K_7_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6f401061c5a066a"
Message-ID-Hash: HBEUTPVALE5QFQUV5UEZRVYVRKJTXARU
X-Message-ID-Hash: HBEUTPVALE5QFQUV5UEZRVYVRKJTXARU
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gbvrW7vB-h3HiX2cmzFarlhzE6I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

 (no hats)

I concur with the concurs of the topic distinction.

Thanks Davey and Shumon for reading something to read later!

tim


On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:30 AM Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I concur with this distinction Ben, and also that both these topics
> deserve discussion.
>
> Shumon.
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:20 AM Ben Schwartz <bemasc=
> 40meta.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Davey,
>>
>> To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
>> primarily with nameserver selection.  Instead, the topic of the side
>> meeting will be about using DNS to perform load balancing of other services
>> and protocols.
>>
>> I think this draft's term ("Nameserver Selection") is good, and we should
>> use that to distinguish it from "DNS Load Balancing".
>>
>> There is certainly some overlap between these notions (as each can be
>> used to implement the other in some fashion), but I would prefer to let
>> both topics mature separately for now.
>>
>> --Ben
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 3, 2024 2:47 AM
>> *To:* dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt
>>
>> Hi folks, I noticed the momentum on DNS load balancing and NS selection
>> topics. Our co-authors have just compiled a draft summarizing the research
>> findings and best practices in this field, and made some recommendations
>> for developers on secure
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
>> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
>>
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I noticed the momentum on DNS load balancing and NS selection topics. Our
>> co-authors have just compiled a draft summarizing the research findings and
>> best practices in this field, and made some recommendations for developers
>> on secure and robust NS selection algorithms. Comments are welcome.
>>
>> Davey
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Date: Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 2:19 PM
>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt
>> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>> Internet-Draft draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt is now available.
>>
>>    Title:   Secure Nameserver Selection Algorithm for DNS Resolvers
>>    Authors: Fenglu Zhang
>>             Baojun Liu
>>             Linjian Song
>>             Shumon Huque
>>    Name:    draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00.txt
>>    Pages:   18
>>    Dates:   2024-07-02
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>    Nameserver selection algorithms employed by DNS resolvers are not
>>    currently standardized in the DNS protocol, and this has lead to
>>    variation in the methods being used by implementations in the field.
>>    Recent research has shown that some of these implementations suffer
>>    from significant security vulnerabilities.  This document provides an
>>    in-depth analysis of nameserver selection utilized by mainstream DNS
>>    software and summarizes uncovered vulnerabilities.  Furthermore, it
>>    provides recommendations to defend against these security and
>>    availability risks.  Designers and operators of recursive resolvers
>>    can adopt these recommendations to improve the security and stability
>>    of the DNS.
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection/
>>
>> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-dnsop-ns-selection-00
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list -- i-d-announce@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to i-d-announce-leave@ietf.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-leave@ietf.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-leave@ietf.org
>