Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for helping browsers use the DoH server associated with a resolver

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 04 September 2018 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E59130F34 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25n0jJr0AgKa for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8D21274D0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:55266) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1fxDq1-0002Bu-15 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:05:57 +0100
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:05:57 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <089C5DFB-DA83-45D0-926F-A24E703E6B81@icann.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809041658310.5965@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <3D4A9165-6EE8-4997-A9F7-DB19632C25F3@icann.org> <5220d889-e587-d6dc-db45-0d76370eabae@nic.cz> <61FF26F6-F2E2-48C8-A4B6-94FC6652D55E@icann.org> <m1ftDKw-0000FDC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <B51AD822-48C8-4A1D-9C1A-82F0998965A3@icann.org> <aab25f82-b3dc-87e6-4cc8-f95efb57d9bd@nic.cz> <491639801.32025.1535184747688@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <089C5DFB-DA83-45D0-926F-A24E703E6B81@icann.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gi-JzKHylO46UdZPnDjGVJZHC0M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for helping browsers use the DoH server associated with a resolver
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:06:03 -0000

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-resolver-associated-doh-01

This draft specifies that the new zone is delegated to the AS112 servers,
but RFC 7534 says the "direct delegation" approach is only supported for
the original AS112 zones. As I understand it the plan for new blackhole
zones is to use DNAME redrection to empty.as112.arpa.

It might be worth generalizing this to a catch-all zone for publishing
information about a recursive server (including the recommended DoH
endpoint, and whatever else might arise). On the other hand we already
have the widely copied bind./CH zone...

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
contribute to the process of peace and disarmament, the elimination
of world poverty, and the collective safeguarding of democracy