Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Thu, 07 September 2017 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E4C132F56 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HwbhHOc4Pd7A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5192A13235A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o22so1510155vke.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yt+0EZ6darj4x6XMaIxop94Qcp7tNdv8bHFMXIF8D/I=; b=FicwVQpUlG1jSvqjhBIN3Wer5yrf8Noh9w/l0bWj3hEkmG/1rhhwWA8DFAxbXa2jxB gwUasTAvrwCGo+VXUcAr/y9x22MM3jYCBt/MEmxRPDGCID6Tt49UNuXYp4TtcbVcf6Ap hMbVGMAy44WELy66STw0ICDu5DJRpbebL0fxAl5fXKk+l/X+5aJSSqwJmLx7eG3LbsEU M+gNNsHqUMGd93hblHNhb3g/qQqK3q9cZfBHIgek9AgeH3hVZaBbCy6bubgQZqv/RvYy YPSC/RqVdT4gqVDD94f+C0VQRpvht47PMRwzXP/MC+2ehuE3+Sa0qnSHT2ze5pTqY4wL nvNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yt+0EZ6darj4x6XMaIxop94Qcp7tNdv8bHFMXIF8D/I=; b=hwtTXjuJ1/5w+g+PEv79Qd/2pYrsFRfDSFkLaD/0aYpYA3XHFc355rLRjS4M22uN1u YnVIZqAhM6UEnIMQSAuiMyyP7gWC8ZAxZuHVJyHCwR2AUErNO+P2omFIN2XoGIU2IifL 1T4+/NXGh0p4Mi4fz069pWtrZ2zbfJzEJEvDEUqJhwFzY1alpQLUJknD91SX2ATMXokV iHZWrcmIiixyoCeXV86Jf9XGxvLyTC+eAHyDHAWDIt1eypFXuOq6KYvdJzh0otBUVbkB yycDY6PD6LUCo/oqfzlxUdjSGD+edRXrFezRPJIUajVmAhVMRodkBtNiYqthRGbll7cC xKzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiExSPBvaa1pl/IPVJGL14s1HPovHAogVRZYLyl1Vbzl59wUStV hj3l9gBUei6V8kl9F7kZPGyVuT+BKf+Y3Uw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD8YeAZ8JQ9KayWPEWOhRDzlc3Kj0JnW6nYWvLTN3wDru0hXBfbyD6FTN1+ekcOa6ntJOs8/8g4UeOAitJE+dI=
X-Received: by 10.31.63.204 with SMTP id m195mr517091vka.111.1504822418503; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.84.78 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:2001:210:80cf:4544:2cf8:7f7d]
In-Reply-To: <20170907143239.x4out34m7weaah2u@nic.fr>
References: <20170907143239.x4out34m7weaah2u@nic.fr>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 08:13:38 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn2DSFO1E_p7jcyp2NPFbTL_6JvnRgL3z0E0NeuNnWUeoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gqZ5xzb2wlXr80BGCRyj31mbygA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 22:13:40 -0000
It's not sensible to presume the action of an independent decision-making body. It's sensible to discuss it, but it should only inform our own process logic, not decide it categorically (I think) I might share your expectation of the outcome, but I would hesitate to reject a draft on a supposition. -George
- [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-interna… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-int… George Michaelson