IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Over on the dbound list: draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 04 April 2019 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41E71201B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=kXbRlTrG; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Olo2dlla
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-qa4MVCBltW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EAA1201A6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6443 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2019 01:20:10 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1929.5ca55bca.k1904; bh=EwmyAnGhZBvCrxYn9xdATJhkNazs1Fg5dpdf5zY/p+k=; b=kXbRlTrGFSVl9fCmlhPXT/qbBxvGpq1WUIy1gPBGsT9iSCe1OSIBfcCRR1fgF6yWeQFuISBsMh1rNwB5VjLWzQyzEI/LlVl6/XMnHtmU5VB0PqlwxpsWrZaF7KXVTXT11n0DL6ScF+AbBWmXAYJ6X2TVBXEPMkDPiXGE1Du+0o57e9enu8XK7mk78ASF6y1SbXndedfLS4mYEwBfOU5KuPHyI0NrU22vW1qgWs4lI7qDT/Jcb6zW5K7wGiuQaWRY
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1929.5ca55bca.k1904; bh=EwmyAnGhZBvCrxYn9xdATJhkNazs1Fg5dpdf5zY/p+k=; b=Olo2dllaBBV4n7GbxnKKzVWaZfkOtV1FdvRBECEctiR4/WK0h4mXCggiiBAMJpmgvsJ8VqoOzjrckSWVBrYedXpNLg+5ayY15cSejD0GA9C2omP6ekRMwk4ag9lVx5Nndm7KTzHuNZN2lRDURBE0FcjFx7KJAJHEp8PkradNdmHmkzknXAKYA2xGtzfsAf2Pu/yl+hlWJUu6ofJZ5LXfkACoSZ9i/HwrBRpPNiHJeGATE4D08e041QT0Q6QTE7Zj
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 04 Apr 2019 01:20:10 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 64DB6201162C3F; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 21:20:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 21:20:09 -0400
Message-Id: <20190404012010.64DB6201162C3F@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <03202426-5fa7-de6a-688d-491bde7402a8@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gxXIL4hRCsb_V7bGpu7Qk6zJxE0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Over on the dbound list: draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 01:20:14 -0000

In article <03202426-5fa7-de6a-688d-491bde7402a8@dcrocker.net> you write:
>Howdy. I've posted a draft that might be of interest to folk in this 
>group.
>
>It's best venue is almost certainly the dbound mailing list, where it is 
>already starting to get discussion (and cross-posted to the dmarc list.)
>
>Discussing it here, on a third list, doesn't seem advisable, but it's 
>already been noted on the dbound discussion that the draft raises issues 
>that might be of concern to the dnsop community.

The part of interest to DNSOP would be section 7 on pages 12 and 13
where it discusses tree walks and potential new additional section
processing to find the closest perimeter record above a name being
checked.

Other than that it's just another TXT record with a _prefix name.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email