Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 14:53 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD4F1299BB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4R5HVzNqPvN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F50D1299B8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p64so136704160qke.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fEE8QL1u2g3Rkt1FVEAa/C1glYM0xR7Rn4FeVj1wXqk=; b=Zysv8kGRSPMZeZQRikcR3h8sEr8YdGp14o1LjHyLVrSeghIjgxz0PQ3caLSlDVBT3v UfFRn2041MJuKeyO4snFz0+/8PDzKPnCQKpefjau+SYj2hj3b36nfBT0d4hNgijQV2kS VXUgoi0ixkME0B1V8PEHF/iFJSNsYkbeeFfhKye1nZ0It5rAff9m7JOcMhT1TZkC4ljp ypIaW/GqNd1qyeW4ermw1b9ZW01tXLZ6O9HNv0hHQJ9Y/eQv9XPsGkR9GIZR0Bm4fn1e 5BNAet7ZwtE4BPQlAvkGQ3/mrSvCBbjj2bmEl/bVst4M5yVHGIbBr392dmHk5Wg6RuW+ gDCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fEE8QL1u2g3Rkt1FVEAa/C1glYM0xR7Rn4FeVj1wXqk=; b=jOfuEPWqOdQSqv3SDuVS+EE/SZUz6jbllMrunpGYmCiZOYz/T28nT0VXK6oRgmGZdL 9NNhov1CynrARAgxa5bDVgkkccEQtt8hvgr4toX/UNsMT/abRZ8/ITJt8/KK4LU5mqE8 DWV+ZAO6LsE/EEhgXbKUeqKkyPkb1zNgiBEh9MoU0jGFag4saVxP1Nd4w3W3NSnYRZNu BZdZnXby7CWiOV28b0I+w4mnfXRWHwtIp9KKHCaZpUdefejPvMhfjsXBMc5iZ/s1MjA5 hiTwGGnICdCmwLCLcs9Irg5kFoSTcmjbXgKzvgBOXkk2MhPT5TTYAC8VYMJEDtvD2/il nTWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0AEhkXMkiM0cOvJSp/W+T6HQa+fB/yqJ/OdE5v7Em4marY++Hx/fkcL202+ter2g==
X-Received: by 10.55.68.66 with SMTP id r63mr30252275qka.116.1490108012472; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c381:c20:6d62:e795:8539:614a? ([2601:181:c381:c20:6d62:e795:8539:614a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w184sm14912771qkc.6.2017.03.21.07.53.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703211011170.30281@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:53:29 -0400
Cc: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A544BEC-F719-4A7B-99E4-DC878EBE7B0C@gmail.com>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703211011170.30281@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h19qcwuKQ1PUCTOjPEAaSHMYabg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:53:35 -0000

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Ralph Droms wrote:
> 
>> If draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03 specified homenet.arpa, the IETF could assign as many different names as wanted for different scoping scenarios, without interacting with ICANN for each assignment.
> 
> arpa is a loaded name for some non-US citizens.

RFC 3172 was written in 2001….which predates the vast majority of internet availability and use, and in fact quite a large number of internet users. Respectfully, I’ve always wondered who has this problem (US or non-US) besides network infrastructure geeks Of a Certain Age (yes, including myself, and many IETF participants).

> localnet.ietf ? :P

For DNSOP participants, I hope this discussion is suggesting some possible ways forward now that we have a problem statement; it’s not clear whether such work will occur in DNSOP, but if work is needed, we should be thinking about how to do it.


Suzanne