Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache-00.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 29 September 2015 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C971B4258 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EP9Fk8MqAOQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D352E1B425B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.79] (142-254-17-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8TEVNhe062232 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:31:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 142-254-17-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.123] claimed to be [10.32.60.79]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:31:28 -0700
Message-ID: <5B34BFA6-CF21-4C64-B92A-7745A3940F3B@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150929092049.4d005a16@casual>
References: <201509291227269136613@cnnic.cn> <20150929092049.4d005a16@casual>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.1r5084)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h1Wn9QFJk3ia5Brt7p6S-mboKhg>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:31:36 -0000

On 29 Sep 2015, at 2:20, Shane Kerr wrote:

> Jiankang Yao,
>
> I think a simpler approach that works in general is the "HAMMER"
> approach proposed by Warren Kumari, Roy Arends, and Suzanne Woolf a
> couple of years ago:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-hammer

A huge +1 to this. The proposal in draft-yao-dnsop-root-cache has many 
stability and operational issues that could cause failures, where as 
"look in your cache and fetch things a bit before they expire" has none, 
even if you don't do it right.

> The approach you propose will have some small advantage if someone
> queries for an entry in the root zone that is not in cache. However
> given the long TTL of root zone entries, such a query will be rare so
> the benefit is quite small.

Yes, exactly.

--Paul Hoffman