Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 05 November 2018 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54D2128BCC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 18:56:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYOA1nVOtXNL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 18:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5F3130DC4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 18:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id wA52vPYg025432 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Nov 2018 18:57:26 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1541386646; bh=C+TkxIT3Xp5JTuC6VUzFbIbkA+iyVW30qnI/1f+HQe4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nF0bFcl3VEYLsTYDlvwVlXFXAeJpe906+0BPNL0pLljxq924ZFGke91m2cnrydCpe QNRyyCxcES4qQO0vykrFQGwBGg/0FSWxUz21/kedJqd4ni937EZKj5VBCL5Uz+u3EQ 5jzspg1IPkDQmNtx4SW6g8mkc5AL3EITjRtUQnk0=
To: ek@loon.co
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <154127656499.10164.10170177869879078794@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAedzxqGsyi1pyyMqmVWiZOgJivr3R1dTWL_9Vwh=0EPCj5DuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <e5464033-ae01-4ab8-5c5d-ceb3194d6a71@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 18:56:43 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxqGsyi1pyyMqmVWiZOgJivr3R1dTWL_9Vwh=0EPCj5DuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h9kb6Dh3afMBwxo-YinQ7X73HTY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 02:56:52 -0000

On 11/4/2018 6:28 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
> One thing I missed earlier (and please forgive me if this was already
> discussed), was whether or not _example* should be reserved in the
> table in draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15#section-4.3.
> 
> Basically, is there any value in reserving _example* for future RFCs
> to use (ones that don't care about the specific _foo label but apply
> to all such labels in some way).


Clever suggestion.  Seems like obvious benefit with no obvious detriment.

So I immediately went to add it and then realized that doing this 
cleanly will take an entry for each RR...

Not so sure we want to do that?

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net