Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 27 December 2019 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A82A12006F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=VpavuItq; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=DqnqObTG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vj0dPPAKOedr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D9412002E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 47010 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2019 21:00:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b7a0.5e067104.k1912; i=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=PA8IIXDh+X+Key8V74ZVCgYnRrGXfByP/S2f4drVIDA=; b=VpavuItq6Nm7ItLJtINrcGjuS0/HWebaqSsJd/N4BucyTvu7tLpD7YprriIIdPeXdiIWeVZ17mQQPJV9pXXRincmL7+0eYTmqaEcdOUlOAwZX+U40DPMq6OFLtJun6WSyNC5JzepP1UnhpCvPXvoKrSbq6+m/UxHjdNZy0OJUTEqa2PjmmK5c5pF8tmRC8EvnhHvCk8iwFqxiGXH0u1RdKHaT+BqJQlHJyRKVwpo97N+Us+jbTB71Gdgu/xSlbaR
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=b7a0.5e067104.k1912; olt=printer-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=PA8IIXDh+X+Key8V74ZVCgYnRrGXfByP/S2f4drVIDA=; b=DqnqObTGFhd0i3Pr5DR3MKWRIw7ICWL9j+p7AWtsW17sWoEtO/2mn33XKf9szkmc+b0R2fH8hnKhJBZD1oyc+sQZaR0BwQ9Ucw+EN29gMkImicGlE8xdYfsgeSnw8cULd/04ZpMUvtzz/cxm1Pshtr+Ja8ag80bbHV6Fyx+AeFk4r48u5iUt+k203EUG8csbjFgONvVfAKD6y3PUU1pLtJVZWOOggXSy8qowZN9O0Z/r85DODj4HCwSv3bvPUGLh
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, printer@iecc.com) via TCP6; 27 Dec 2019 21:00:51 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6F9E111C00B4; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 16:00:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 16:00:50 -0500
Message-Id: <20191227210051.6F9E111C00B4@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: ericorth@google.com
In-Reply-To: <CAMOjQcGLhu-27932_FoyNmV=7RGG074zzkaGNxHMs0qrfAO+4A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hBL_y1QqBmWc0_98Jc6zAYNZUGo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 21:00:55 -0000
In article <CAMOjQcGLhu-27932_FoyNmV=7RGG074zzkaGNxHMs0qrfAO+4A@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Chrome is not willing to subject its users to such an easily avoidable >"pain" simply as an incentive to other operators to help fix the badness. Hi. I'm a guy in a hard to pronounce country somewhere in the southern hemisphere. I just set up a little web site at my local ISP. They handle the DNS and said something about CNAME and SVCB and the guy complained that the national domain registry never answers the phone and it takes a month to register new 2LD names. When my mother looks at my web site on her Android phone, what will she see? Signed, Wondering
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Vladimír Čunát
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 feedback Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 fee… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 fee… Patrick McManus
- [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Ben Schwartz
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Patrick McManus
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-httpssvc-01 fee… Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Masataka Ohta
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Eric Orth
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SVCB chain lengths Paul Vixie