Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5C1C14F6BB for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 01:47:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.105 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnomQZiH1rt0 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 01:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90D1C14F68C for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 01:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.207.253] (89-24-37-112.nat.epc.tmcz.cz [89.24.37.112]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42CFD1C1226; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:47:05 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail.nic.cz; auth=pass smtp.auth=libor.peltan@nic.cz smtp.mailfrom=libor.peltan@nic.cz DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1721292425; bh=uhxd8JNx1lYREyv13U2mDgOQ/kCtQ/UriONPklO1b7w=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To: Subject:To:Cc; b=ojacbygkXZAKxSfqQIrVKUyDWKaXDik6ahQPPdDGEcZabhsuwE27NNtpD/EoXXkEx DF9p/RYFqFR0Lo87ttCObP5vCCU0fqAjnR1ZqM7sAjrYpBXkh1N+++1pGTli4aBNZe S09D82woESqzORDHu7TSRsy1Wbs4J31QUL5zuRMA= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------eQOvcScK0f200R0JGC2ugudo" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:47:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Mark Andrews References: <8ECF9259-8B1A-43AC-917B-8DD6A1183C27@isc.org> Content-Language: en-US From: "libor.peltan" In-Reply-To: <8ECF9259-8B1A-43AC-917B-8DD6A1183C27@isc.org> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Server: mail X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 42CFD1C1226 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.09 / 20.00]; BAYES_HAM(-5.00)[100.00%]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13036, ipnet:89.24.0.0/16, country:CZ]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-0.984]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3] Message-ID-Hash: AT5G3OZMI4W7WIESGVX56M72RMUYAE34 X-Message-ID-Hash: AT5G3OZMI4W7WIESGVX56M72RMUYAE34 X-MailFrom: libor.peltan@nic.cz X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Yorgos Thessalonikefs , dnsop X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BDNSOP=5D_Re=3A_New_Version_Notification_for_draft-yorgos-dnsop-?= =?utf-8?q?dry-run-dnssec-02=2Etxt?= List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------eQOvcScK0f200R0JGC2ugudo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit My point was that example.com. IN DS49172 13 130 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320 example.com. IN DS49172 13   2 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320 is more equivalent (i.e. the change from the first to the second looks safer and more straightforward) than example.com. IN DS49172 13 7 02e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320 example.com. IN DS49172 13 2 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320 /Libor Dne 18. 07. 24 v 10:27 Mark Andrews napsal(a): > It would look like a regular DS. The only difference would be that the first byte of the digest would contain the sub type. This is just internal structure of the digest. --------------eQOvcScK0f200R0JGC2ugudo Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

My point was that

example.com. IN DS 49172 13 130 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320
example.com. IN DS 49172 13   2 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320

is more equivalent (i.e. the change from the first to the second looks safer and more straightforward) than

example.com. IN DS 49172 13 7 02e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320
example.com. IN DS 49172 13 2 e2c8c32fb3c40586e0dabc367bfde4368b8dff52a7ffc60f619c720ec7767320

/Libor

Dne 18. 07. 24 v 10:27 Mark Andrews napsal(a):
It would look like a regular DS. The only difference would be that the first byte of the digest would contain the sub type.   This is just internal structure of the digest.
--------------eQOvcScK0f200R0JGC2ugudo--