Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)

Tim Wicinski <> Tue, 12 July 2022 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23444C14F747; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.093
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xg55bR4T0FVB; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C130C14F5E1; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id bf9so13776512lfb.13; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bcdGOpFVWh/wUQw/q3yyUykkCKkBUKQLTCfjYkBehS8=; b=J7tArpHCHv3TeQzG+E/OW7HBa1MPtkEAvwWPQk+gUjTuwQa8fSWeb2TdBz252QXq9+ mySsvG5lHuDEL2pxpLPdtFKrOVWfOVdsS02lSBo72tl8YmQa7kBE1aIR9U8Kw1ylOHgK Wj4e/WkUpvgFSGEwpGVvSpfmIurwRd0dprbPXlfL9KCI5/h07jiRZTbVYP7W7MS05llp 2iuxS8Sq/0CTVm/oGgR+Gp+hTI4aHdkA0BRbIR+7WU3XNfHehDuUipfyUYQd2yH+LbqC uOme29Xj0hFYSDxiHBl/4Cn8N7WFe4HCmo/DbTwCHUIHq29Vd4PgDyQJ/CxQFWnwFMPZ Inqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bcdGOpFVWh/wUQw/q3yyUykkCKkBUKQLTCfjYkBehS8=; b=2oAxDixVbjJ0Q8KHSxiV/C+TLycptQf/dgH2ubUPp8mZBJhU3tLHEs2oih1ltynnZG nyPrP1RjR/qbmYNW+FfMTfvrAeC1kdTwnmSsEAQ6aPoQXKK5IMyCKV0hs7OXBYtT7Pgb AU3T4V7GO24ilwhyVVqKVBXqs4jeud2T3xo10x0JXPoWwncYmUWr07oHj9mMcGUpNOy/ 9pJg7qmklX9uRWAB/AXE3L2aLf5UDOIoyi4Q0BN+l2XKGrI7VEfghBG7Mj8wjqAl55L7 CcksKJ6OSCvpJM4Z9zLNos5MWxruJGzprZp9P6YPCDmUrFU8dPVk8fT9hCHdOhnkcz7p WOFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8DjHMNMjXJMJzW3fP7vMyJmSGKnEZhGaUWEemw4cWL0QTdA6vG 3Lj4mwzVSo1sfpHPcDzG+oXip3+uOSqxPSQE4+RA8O6RYjU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sLiR6Vq7PSyjIuKQrLJ+WCsYubEziHD+UcEkJ5XyR4ow5n4KeQ5urNJz9nd4B8R7C5rBXAGeq16+D9kg6H+Y8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1104:b0:487:34de:5f9d with SMTP id l4-20020a056512110400b0048734de5f9dmr15534802lfg.162.1657630934988; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 06:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Tim Wicinski <>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:02:03 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: dnsop <>
Cc: dnsop-chairs <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000c7a4a05e39b477b"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Document Adoption Poll (June 2022)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:02:21 -0000

Thanks to everyone who’s participated in the poll. As we’ve said before,
the chairs rely on a number of factors when setting WG administrative
priorities, but occasional polls help us clarify feedback we’re hearing
from the WG list, other DNS-oriented WGs, and the broader community.

Since WG consensus determines whether we advance a draft we’ve adopted, we
work hard to make sure drafts that are adopted are likely to result in
quality documents that will have that consensus support to publish as RFCs.

Additional comments are always welcome.

Our Poll answers are "Adopt Now","Adopt Not Now", and "Don't Adopt"

We mapped these responses to 1, 0, -1 (no answer is also 0).

Final Results:

* draft-sahib-domain-verification-techniques, 14

* draft-dwmtwc-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures, 13

* draft-rebs-dnsop-svcb-dane, 12

draft-klh-dnsop-rfc8109bis, 7

draft-wing-dnsop-structured-dns-error-page, 2

draft-dulaunoy-dnsop-passive-dns-cof, -2

Our Poll answers are "Adopt Now","Adopt Not Now", and "Don't Adopt"

We mapped these responses to 1, 0, -1 (no answer is also 0).

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:44 AM Tim Wicinski <> wrote:

> All
> We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working group.
> My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for all of these and let the
> working group sort it out, but was told that is just crazy. Since Warren
> loves these poll things, we put another one together on all the documents
> in question.
> We'll run this poll for two weeks and end on the 9th of July. However, we
> have a chai9rs call on the 5th of July and I'm confident we'll have an
> obvious clear set of documents to begin adoption calls on.
> thanks
> tim