IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 31 August 2018 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BEC130E58 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zB2kJsi7nJgt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343E5130E51 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so10635288ljk.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FAlYmzSPkjDS5XVxt+0CweShE1tHRP+DepvBnYotLTw=; b=KXF0eEUQGt+Tgm78Xfhtdlwr/Byo7Ta7mkoxOY5d/DO+rXYCFTMkDAq9Po0RNComK6 /xlZAHiLsNEvcg0zpGmjOiKK8sOIDfXj5I7mixsM0nkSizt1KTiwqG2Y8vDmDqkLe5eD W3iSYVmuB0b2CccB1kDeQ6rUBD6WNRvQzjj5Y/BfGWzM6D9tNesTppxAsUurVZdQMTNs 5EHwIezu1rmpl7otph5p0GzHH9JnvZJ91O1c3qsKfpR4rAwHnUYix5be8SLy/uuJZRqN LX2IMnSM51ZEGeZzzDUxJfqZQcYVVJsvGHD8nh0/WylevoMWoYHNFOXr/BetGw3YmDAI 2NPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FAlYmzSPkjDS5XVxt+0CweShE1tHRP+DepvBnYotLTw=; b=pZ3bNdlFkWHNYkRj23IGMS+hU03ZZkx1MZ/yjsWbgHa5WcHyGs+4DQmhuodUlELGm3 4SjY6bU7oSZ1bjepGHYvKyBpNaVLVIUtcK41GqCeJcDCyWeDE/4PZqiUJFgzBmFCEwAq 6/ogP9O6tmb6K6zPphSITZP4IzTUJ3aao8s3RvS/KWKScISRF+IFA3APUgivo4H0/TSm 4g80fIg9bPm8k8l4sufgelFDjVjvIOzpNL+P4FR067jjf2f5Y5XvTMhwOYQJOTbNPHnt Nnou41Dxm5+TdXuycHPZsvUmUiTVwHxPqRyabYiMoxz6LQXFhv2at1TfnQyrqmjzLdlA br7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BxL3zA3Pi1FbJJHlmTV2t0lxCOQmxfAQYbi5Fk5lJOSUmf6G+x tvsLvrT6iyBItrM92GEQnslk0gK9EN4D2XkViGbzxw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaqNv0aT4aP0XME4uVdrjqF7MFP1lf5pyGkbDVuUEwUNuQE8FNNAhYDgoFdnL1nzuDG+byrKaiyeIh7BD+jcX0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3e0d:: with SMTP id l13-v6mr8527447lja.151.1535734663514; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ab3:4091:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <58DFE854-26D6-459A-AD1D-8E05036C5099@icann.org>
References: <153554463554.14882.8129348448370636392.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <58DFE854-26D6-459A-AD1D-8E05036C5099@icann.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:57:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP6Wzx0Qt3hG=n340ZLwZgLkjcDE5dge4GLqu9i5edx2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "suzworldwide@gmail.com" <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016a0000574be177c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hWnOEXni_VIwf6xJddp0KPFirjw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:57:48 -0000

That's understandable. I think it would be most helpful to somehow tag
those cases so that the reader can see that they are ambiguous rather than
just rereading and being confused.

-Ekr


On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
wrote:

> Ekr pinged me in Jabber after I sent this, and I wanted to clarify
> something bigger-picture on this document. We know that there are a number
> of definitions that are not clear. In the WG discussion, we tried hard to
> get them clarified, and often met resistance in the form of "I have always
> thought it meant X" vs. "I have always thought it meant Y" that could not
> be resolved. On some of the terms that Ekr asked for clarity on, we had
> even done separate threads. In the end, there was reasonably strong WG
> consensus that the document was the best we could do, even thought most of
> the folks who said that probably had at least one bit that they didn't like
> in the document.
>
> --Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email