Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 05 March 2014 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520481A01A6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:23:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6US7RNtoHm6u for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DE71A0072 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 06:23:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id D1A5A3BD1D; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 432F1F00AF7; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:16:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:16:01 +0000
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
Message-ID: <20140305141601.GB17117@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <201403051107.s25B7ext069332@givry.fdupont.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201403051107.s25B7ext069332@givry.fdupont.fr>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 13.10 (saucy)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h_x5ogjEOQMRzQi5qNLHXhtaD_M
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:23:05 -0000

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 12:07:40PM +0100,
 Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> wrote 
 a message of 53 lines which said:

> Or with other words you don't need confidentiality with 8.8.8.8

Like many other people here, I disagree. We need confidentiality for
open public resolvers more than we need it for an on-campus or on-LAN
resolver, because, for OpenDNS or Google Public DNS, the "last mile"
is very long and offers much more possibilities of sniffing.