Re: [DNSOP] CLIENT-SUBNET bis appetite?

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> wrote:
> Any appetite for it? Don't throw things at me.. I ask because the
> current thing is slowly getting more widely deployed and there are
> design issues that can do with a ECS2 that breaks from ECS1 protocol. I
> ask because I'm once again having to deal with myriad implementation
> cases and dislike it.
>

<no hats, other than author on the original doc.>
As I'm sure you know / remember, getting the first version though was
quite a slog. I suspect that, seeing as there seems to be good support
for the initial version, getting a new one done will be much simpler,
but the obvious question is:
How would ECS2 differ, and how would it interact with ECS1 / backward
compatibility?

W

</no hats>
>                 Mukund
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf