Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Tue, 04 July 2017 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82491326F8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mj7HDGwOZryJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CF3132705 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u62so112997725pgb.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=Jexy41v/+ZGD/RsRqU2r1QcdaAAVQO273l/x2IdhIMI=; b=Myj3Fqigmn4hi3uTCqHoYSFcWobukSeh+J1KW0y5gXEzNbMwMvZt61qYNBKKDtjLCD /9Z5fxmMNp3Mxy0hdYIO46lTAezRDIpPAayi6AzI9J3j0CrU4AOkF/5poq24J9mQEA/q SkpCVsaXDa9UcbGQ2dQr4LlfR7h+4m7WakSou+x35aWVITbkr1r27lvRXG2F4R9TdpCc FY952cCgMvRHqFhLi02LXODiCUWNz8rhCXm51lCz80bbnTNuSv03Jdva0dCAZn9BV0JB yiqsYk7HMmn5cgHn1H+3S/ru/YsWZ0XGtX5lulvRaRtnjbkmsUI2Rz134vbvr9GzS8v2 oQBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=Jexy41v/+ZGD/RsRqU2r1QcdaAAVQO273l/x2IdhIMI=; b=pTFEFF0YcFr57Xdilife92dVBiDDH9k56jRBjTmisBysUnmrvYfJzyXG7uaAgPfhHK XsnhH+D8jiA0FDl6kG/r3NF3RVay8PIenoIaVek3UlXXSYDw0HQK3tdC1y99bjcyAiC1 5RxkZsLTBG4D10+NZPQ69WCM8XUkOzdSS4Rr71kd52Ax2TxGRFeJwn36C1/Fe80D9XrD 4n9cun+C0kPY+PDwMASO69hqq8GO4JizN9WrSB3gI+vnz7i/HKsXwQVvQbsZrifL55ou 1WOYNGCEIRx8FX6eO86FRDVSxoBTvtvViWB4xna2m1zXkVsv9eCBcS33hWJimCgI/Lkj +CZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111aPEU1ZbCNl/Y0Qj0sXW9Jrcx1l4t7lgNXJdvkEXc1Wy7TTBOx VfEmNGaOkv6w/ca2
X-Received: by 10.84.132.39 with SMTP id 36mr17555043ple.237.1499191924881; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.7.50] (c-24-6-172-77.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.172.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm42659218pfb.55.2017.07.04.11.12.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:07:30 -0700
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5156fc17-9db9-4ddb-8e6f-4210243d8550@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <595BD773.8050502@redbarn.org>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com> <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com> <m2podgxq97.wl-randy@psg.com> <5F120298-CD66-4CB6-9DC5-0C5DF6F02CC7@fugue.com> <CACfw2hhx+-Z=7ZnnaOkToc+Bd7aKDpBFt+nFUxkt9sKqLn4D8Q@mail.gmail.com> <2DF1AFC7-643B-4610-8EB8-0616D3D0B024@fugue.com> <595BD53E.60701@redbarn.org> <E739C1CB-E60E-4B4B-99CF-1E6C68CB6926@rfc1035.com> <595BD773.8050502@redbarn.org>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 5156fc17-9db9-4ddb-8e6f-4210243d8550@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="595bda71_643c9869_da49"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hyXueZVIzolfCC-PnGh7piGOO9s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new DNS classes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 18:12:07 -0000

Paul,

On Jul 4, 2017, 10:59 AM -0700, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>;, wrote:

> > > On 4 Jul 2017, at 18:49, Paul Vixie<paul@redbarn.org>; wrote:
> > > while IETF governs the protocol, ICANN only governs the IN class.

Sorry, could you point me to anything that documents this?  My impression has always been that ICANN governs (I'd prefer the term coordinates myself) what "the community" feels it should coordinate. I don't recall this being limited to a particular DNS class, but I might have missed it.

> nobody ever got a bonus for making things simpler.

Oh sure they have.

Thanks,
-drc