Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Wed, 15 May 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B4D12040D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRUZ4L-1Noet for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1D212040C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id t1so662787qtc.12 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DuIs0VlrmLjpt8MvAlVbESOHg3Lz2BeaEzbWUo3QShE=; b=SCTcalM2/msbbReq+JfOV1daSgLVI3XBC2a6FMyOr7THe3vpVs6C2tPTeYZWLjrCjY z3Sa4hXGekFVGfsL2VNLupso+YuUMSt+cBQIjM1Dkid2jLdBigGeKyNRjxXyUSQM8wzX NjnTV6GzoZDNenuCPMBTxV/BfWyN1LIlCzw1sEliGsPYrXzhmg1xmAsglF2OkBwrG/7L cnETv0c8QeP4xqij21o97QPm6P5HWLa+Br7VHfcfBXDNFhtaqCH2mWxapjK4vJdYUORp e4GSC6oLUGzWme5JUNwhwp060YhxmbOkksEZSgbF08HG+L03Dmm97NDgWAKgZnkBm0zG Ho7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DuIs0VlrmLjpt8MvAlVbESOHg3Lz2BeaEzbWUo3QShE=; b=UrJ3QZHWStPcYYIUoD+v/emu9M4+7QPaAtc/EGkixit60wGtxsgWkskYM9LLLmT6fI 2pUnLbudgUwQ5BFlxD/FYKZU5RGHn+KVersXrIpxrCsDVdpEQ22kV9dOGfWkrocwW23Y EgtBqPaAnvqqqDTySKB2jM+sQsNdY/3UT+TorDE2IfVvOXiOxvESWsS86mXfpQ7SffUe 6xX5QFbuE5jRH2iLaTlsZOYAs0++CwPRNDe6CoF5J9MFXi2LVQo5UGH4CTT+6JgaQ0FI dy2znJVr4EQ6mHEKHjXDL7/h3MK7FAurz/tpgbVReCzSBQ+K4HXsES+pxF114cc6luMg FLog==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXKlccn10VjzNCVXGGSehwtd0Ocq/u12d0KnVnWLT8GuSB6Fpa2 RJwvPsEnJImR25gaA55fDIKEQZ26TzZsMbHr1YSaOQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxO8U1CZUHTaPV/MCcsdZCFZQ5GHqAQqhER/dteDSdpubUNjq9aqgFNNT7Dna/XyxZuKjKU7SQe7wJHOohww7o=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d17d:: with SMTP id c58mr25604762qvh.172.1557943068127; Wed, 15 May 2019 10:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com> <20190515170020.3F76420141A62A@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20190515170020.3F76420141A62A@ary.qy>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 13:57:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8DTfhf7N9Wx0EaRC7kTWJcRMdv2v6P9Z+HH0DzvGbAuhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028052a0588f0e3f8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/i0rXs9fyvM1qc86CFr7sLCM4tJg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 17:57:52 -0000

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:00 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>; wrote:

> In article <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com>; you write:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >In the spirit of deprecating things I have submitted a draft to deprecate
> the status opcode.
>
> RFC 1034 says it's "To be defined" so this seems a little premature.
>
> Other than that, go for it.
>
>
Does this increase or decrease the 'camel' page count?

-- 
Bob Harold