Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Wed, 23 December 2015 05:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36A1ACAD4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12-6XR7f4Yao for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22b.google.com (mail-qg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBED1AC430 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id o11so70424532qge.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VyM/lTCQijzmTHQoddyajfdw98MPUKqgWTmg/RjzAMM=; b=lB8SNwg6FnOupcXRO0p/PnbddgNwRxZufQ3vcymKrTyQoU5A0Bofg7qqEeOKpOmCVq cTZpjVlySrZz/c7S/NEcBqYVY6p8NRFeuKbTrey+nZsxo9nrcqXVr9oVUFJ9KLTgBaa6 kBE7tvDRyCKWXdWKlAMY6b4igNlzA0oxf4vLIc3PISJpWaiBfQGePMxsT+2RhuvQpkAr 6970AxV5z477JkpQrSM5+SVb05kInetwP9/Ak4DCyiJvCoL0NLl/8gGabCbo1AqzOkyz 6mMJJ2E7oWk2mOmSzVLZrwNGg/xHViSBvATJsTnenytWMLIxENgk2IgA52FO0puN9jzd Ud+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VyM/lTCQijzmTHQoddyajfdw98MPUKqgWTmg/RjzAMM=; b=MbvFiVEi6Il4xviyX/w20Nrr5PmRRu6OkYbK7aNKOYEep2bFCRcytNXn7IU9fJ0RvR iYiLg+tCP3xziflpiA/Bn5SLTc+jS5turuKLoIJaLQHUM+bh8IcYDwzq4WliFSlUqc2p 2VoWvlHHDfsoz21UeX+YGNrQwdAmCwI1pJSLBZ8wkJ14YEHoCbyJF7fKpIfNGRsUGuff 5cVgVZJkn+w3VGBINB6od49cev1ekiZuZckPR8HlakULBiLtfgYRWtxXH/zxIfyZ1nH2 +Kd/Q19hmCh9usW6Y5wWWGKK12akZmXzBcIxEYyyzzweh0DsR8Mrmoe8ir260sH+ezUD hX2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1bMhSQX8N1XKEme8xc9mul0F8SatN3Cmu5gaKqXjUr4q8PFiqk/fe17GSlZj2iHf0mg0kKzq44PI2rCBPokqRU6l2Dw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.86.38 with SMTP id o35mr37935960qgd.56.1450848734812; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.103.214 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:dce6:64b9:baaa:4b48]
In-Reply-To: <3956416.L8VTfUimHa@linux-85bq.suse>
References: <20151217020754.6915b71c@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <3040894.aPaWt5ExKr@linux-85bq.suse> <CAKr6gn2koTJ=vr5nZLhPnREMqAST8RLgJKPmOfLEouHNJgovWw@mail.gmail.com> <3956416.L8VTfUimHa@linux-85bq.suse>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:32:14 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0KqgfBGmYLhRQa9M-XPn_zmKw6O1Pp=LPth2Wq7jQqAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@tisf.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c14f7676408005278a0b28"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/i4hVAz2FMnLl5YUhiEc4snl-Gkk>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:32:17 -0000
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg10479.html et seq. -G On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Paul Vixie <vixie@tisf.net> wrote: > On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 03:20:05 PM George Michaelson wrote: > > > I think the REST/JSON conversation is worth having too! Didn't Jay Daley > > > submit some ideas on that a while back? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-dns-json/history/ > > > > -- > > P. Vixie >
- [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we try to… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch