IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 30 October 2015 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6181B3519; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVtQyOIZKCIa; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E491B3517; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sume.local (unknown [103.5.140.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B88BD13B62; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 19:48:51 -0700
Message-ID: <2645641.g5A1d4IqNa@sume.local>
Organization: Vixie Enterprises
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.10-1-default; KDE/4.14.10; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <SNT152-W71BC37ACD2C8775FEA32A9B72F0@phx.gbl>
References: <SNT407-EAS358C1970FD337AB12A4E9A3B74E0@phx.gbl> <56311D5E.1070101@bogus.com> <SNT152-W71BC37ACD2C8775FEA32A9B72F0@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iC4Zeb3OvuAxWFhfJUxXBt-4xyk>
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, yaojk <jiankangyao@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Meeting agenda
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 02:48:54 -0000

On Friday, October 30, 2015 01:52:18 AM yaojk wrote:

> > in order to utilize expensive high
> > bandwith discussion time 
> > 
> 
> 
> I agree with you about this point. We should not waste the high bandwith
> discussion time.We should fully utilize the expensive f2f discusstion
> time.

yao, your draft has failed to garner sufficient interest to warrant discussion 
time, even when compared to "any other business" (matters brought to the floor 
in real time.) my own view, as i've already told you privately, is that no 
possible change to your draft will make it seem useful to the dnsop wg.

i think if you want to discuss some other idea, for example, persistent 
coherent metadata caching, to see if there's interest in our problem 
statement, and comments on our proposed approach, then the wg chairs would 
certainly make expensive f2f time available.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email