IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [art] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-03.txt

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 24 March 2018 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88CA127876 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 02:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=cCrwGoOT; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=jP8fx8jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHAMgWlYqyng for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 02:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44A6127869 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 02:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 78212 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2018 09:15:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13182.5ab6174f.k1803; bh=xB+MQFqPazWR37spb/aTVTgNN/a00lNfQOdy7aOeiZE=; b=cCrwGoOTpo64jIQ4Ds0Xt407Zecu8WteTtxVezDnT79oKCp2zQsTHQn22zUEupuPLHLTj4bs+d+YgALUOKJuJwQRNvbgBlnzTdsklW2ObGGnOZEtek8BojE7tqkpXRZ/MFqHHvaCXzR2dfLleUlDe52wygte57xVLki1XnDoQ/G1sGW0wZTPIXKN9hkmwSZuSITw59TgJp8aQcF1jQ7+Gk+NpMjMDP2mEorNJdJ/GBb3lOA+YEf+bSsZxAr5gaPN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=13182.5ab6174f.k1803; bh=xB+MQFqPazWR37spb/aTVTgNN/a00lNfQOdy7aOeiZE=; b=jP8fx8jpMrxKT1059prxBZfmpETW2V28FdHV24YyLh5YqWcLz8nXkfo3rsmGmXtxi4fR9/SpdNLa9KkXvRT0LZa+nHm1Z76GqTD7P1sRHJCvOSGxUBBP0oKcPdDTkaYNYkZYPIBa5iWSmVRKf16s10Xlyz2ziCgS8LCs6Zao5ZKeFZuu+P7/rEJcDJ0oi68p5jmvahSdcrFwsnwI4V1qoerUsisgzTBchbqaYW1DJei+PW+zeNgZXEXShSygAGzc
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 24 Mar 2018 09:15:58 -0000
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:15:59 +0000
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1803240912230.14981@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: art@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <93b65f18-4ca7-dceb-cbba-fcbb1ea1713f@dcrocker.net>
References: <20180323180248.9B2AD238892C@ary.iecc.com> <93b65f18-4ca7-dceb-cbba-fcbb1ea1713f@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iFs_hXFgwuej_wQsrn5RqA6IAgc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [art] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 09:16:03 -0000

>>  I see a message on dnsop from you proposing a bunch of things
>>  including "rationalizing" names, and comments from Andrew and Peter
>>  saying they like that approach.
>
> I am not finding any message from me with that word in it, so I've no idea 
> what you are referring to.

Perhaps the link you sent was to the wrong message:

>    https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg20708.html

It says:

  2. Create a separate document that specifies modifications to the SRV and
  URI documents, rationalizing the use of underscore names, through the
  mechanism defined in -attrleaf-.

> Take a look, at the latest draft.  If you have concerns with it, please point 
> to specific text in it.

Same problems that Vixie, Andrei, and I have been pointing to all along. 
It retroactively redefines SRV and contradicts RFC 6335.

See the link I sent yesterday to a version I wrote that sets up a registry 
that documents existing practice without trying to change history.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email