Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

[Vladimír Čunát <[e-mail]>]

On 2/21/20 1:04 PM, Klaus Malorny wrote:
> according to my colleagues, who are in contact with the customers, the
> use case is mostly in the context of CDNs. Some of them maintain a
> larger set of domains with alternate spellings of their product names,
> with different ccTLDs, some for promotions etc. The content for these
> domains are hosted by CDNs and not by us (we are not in that business
> right now). They want their domains to work also without a "www."
> prefix, and for now we use a web redirection service. This has some
> disadvantages, e.g. a "heavy" extra roundtrip to an HTTP server and in
> respect with HTTPS support. So our problem is exactly the "CNAME in
> the apex" problem. HTH. 

To me that sounds exactly like one of the main points addressed by
HTTPSSVC (draft).

--Vladimir