Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 18 February 2014 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B311A02B8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:08:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGPNUTh854qm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753241A02AF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ix-2.local (unknown [88.131.8.202]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7AB0226E9; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:08:45 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5303E7FD.9030805@frobbit.se>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:08:45 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <CAESS1RPh+UK+r=JzZ9nE_DUqcvNtZiS6TNt1CDN-C0uiU7HP=A@mail.gmail.com> <52FEF407.30405@redbarn.org> <20140215140133.GA6990@sources.org> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1402151449280.23619@bofh.nohats.ca> <D82F49E8-9A06-4F52-8E3E-DF5C8D0B7549@virtualized.org> <53006595.5010207@frobbit.se> <6.2.5.6.2.20140218074550.0c380cc8@resistor.net> <5B5AE40C-6D26-419C-A16A-392AF2C33446@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5B5AE40C-6D26-419C-A16A-392AF2C33446@hopcount.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qS6OgWcuKPDONgWvTgMPC2nDAobM7sjnA"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iKan6zA2pPZScCR54PLwePRr7lg
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] meta issue: WG to discuss DNS innovation (was Re: draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns-00)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:08:51 -0000

On 2014-02-18 19:58, Joe Abley wrote:
> I appreciate that knowing the process made things easier (mainly; I
> was wrong about some things and had to be educated). But I would not
> describe the process as difficult, and certainly not insurmountable.

Agree, and correct (I did the same with URI RR-Type). But then to start
to define applications using the RR... :-(

   paf