Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA8D12963B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEBdMkKnI6Go for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com (tmpmail.powerdns.com [128.199.32.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1278412961D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9416D6C7EF; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tmpmail.powerdns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKhgy0jxwATf; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:bba::42]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E69B6C7ED; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:17:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EF5BAC2DFB; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:17:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:17:25 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <20161221071725.GE884@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk> <6EBB4C5C-E2D9-40B9-86B8-03614804282D@vpnc.org> <20161220174650.GA884@server.ds9a.nl> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612201307360.17053@bofh.nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612201307360.17053@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iKlm-HIB440RQeYALaGrDPM68sc>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:17:27 -0000

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 01:12:06PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> One would hope it interops, as this document only describes an IXFR/AXFR
> of a zone with existing RRTYPEs with some semantics associated to CNAME
> records for other applications (such as DNS servers)

The "some semantics" parts are what is standardized. The rest is indeed good
old DNS. The "some semantics" parts need to interoperate because otherwise
they don't mean the same thing here and there, and we can't create a hybrid
internet ecosystem.

It is important the 'some semantics', which by the way are real work to
implement correctly, are standardized.

	Bert