Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation

"Niall O'Reilly" <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> Thu, 08 January 2015 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3296F1ACD09 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 02:39:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K7GVRA5dd8LX for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 02:39:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E851A89AD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 02:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ex7so2343057wid.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:39:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0Rz+TQ8J49sU7ln8h16eDZWRhZ0gWXGWrYYmsLvv9p8=; b=e24KJBhnmgersW7EB/k0upWfMN6Q8/IhdqoCI83kwUfkhHod5GhQiuPd7JeecnrfJd T1MZ0XR5yTM94PCaZhDcIAXZEDuWobEqRoM33Omq/N5qAJNsqSiTwGwGQwiPBnDeLyKI eCWXyN6w1ydtVb1F5ZxzfjZKzLJ5RBl0T+sKelTZwh3xySQ8p8OjzlxUZOKQTzqAROKO 8vPT7CkM8v8xhOV+HhvrEqn6tzb89F3X7pNFddpN/cweKNnGAbK6x9i+FgQMRM/42TBG 8APG7ANrb2fRA/VaQ0pcky7cweXhh+c7lPlK63VVQGsrhGWxZlECuS3AbA1Svpg4GFVu ElQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnl6IzxDc0v++qVsoC+xRlb35CG9kf3oXSaevZOMMvzKa6ojFtUBbAprioPbAm5hgeEENe6
X-Received: by 10.194.236.200 with SMTP id uw8mr9005047wjc.10.1420713560691; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-179.wlan.no8.be.ucd.ie ([159.134.212.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm5587845wjr.26.2015.01.08.02.39.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:39:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Google-Original-From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:18 +0000
Message-ID: <m2fvbl4kvd.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
In-Reply-To: <54A9BB75.30301@redbarn.org>
References: <CAH1iCirCRpJxHWu62nCSTCmSumXfTNHi=-jt5eWXzRgspJjm9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCip7iGgM=eiaVcy3fHx+KdOJgd5Rh8zLsnDPMgoEnE-HvA@mail.gmail.com> <0BB798D6-60F4-492D-819A-EF4E0F5848B5@virtualized.org> <20150104193602.GA23109@sources.org> <2C89D784-79BF-4906-9ABB-1B0EACA1D408@nic.br> <54A9BB75.30301@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.4 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iSgkHccVySQDVTGjZ1DtRc-gU2U>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:25 -0000

At Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:15:17 -0800,
Paul Vixie wrote:
> 
> also noting, dotless domains exist. dotless hostnames (for mail, web,
> etc) by def'n do not.

  I don't understand.
  
  Such a definition seems to be cheerfully violated in the case of
  http://dk/


  Best regards,
  Niall O'Reilly