IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Ask for advice of 3 new RRs for precise traffic scheduling

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 14 December 2017 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEC2128D3E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:42:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qJMOn11nlYgy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A80E7127599 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:1143:ea77:b6ef:69f3] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:1143:ea77:b6ef:69f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8353961FA2; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:42:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A32F04D.7050307@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:42:37 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.22 (Windows/20171208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>
CC: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "zuopeng@cnnic.cn" <zuopeng@cnnic.cn>
References: <2017121315404971736813@cnnic.cn> <20171213081823.GA8970@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20171213084342.GA30523@server.ds9a.nl> <201712131736325755287@cnnic.cn> <20171213095015.GC30523@server.ds9a.nl> <20171214214056.r37cz5rbmpxwjw3q@mycre.ws>
In-Reply-To: <20171214214056.r37cz5rbmpxwjw3q@mycre.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iVA7s5NLrJu_DImlEfPLilZjmZc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Ask for advice of 3 new RRs for precise traffic scheduling
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:42:40 -0000


Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Or, put another way, we like existing resolver implementations just
> fine, we just wish there were a lot more resolver instances, and closer
> to clients:-)

on it. no smiley.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status