IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Please review and provide feedback -- draft-stw-6761ext

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 23:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A073C12002E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkB9gu9HYAMM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B383D12000F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id v38so12848298qtb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Mk75DdTAi1F5L3bewBs2wBznbEsmp0L09fPLDqe25fg=; b=j8ZAE62QxGRGlpWtzA5V/4x9P769/dUfuTua4VzjFa+zLGprVFI/dxKCMAtZJWhwhq JmvPp1qiRKQWc19u13z24XiM8XVSHRm2hqFRHq9n/gEjcaYwCvX7ETySpJDmtWM40ZMo mFHPeohWgT1aoIeclIiYZApMYUZiV8E+gvd/F1fkXmQls1KB35Bw0NlsMCijSJK6bhSq hQbEWeSKpAbI8MXUCBExznM3KkYE6Qm3R3d0CzCiGtF0Se6J4igct7kH1Ridj4X/+dgm +bBv6U7L5j2aMEY0hzdNszRz0/knLJxW4HA8rV76Gh18+uLVB0aja2YVXFeNfm2e1UBy BCHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Mk75DdTAi1F5L3bewBs2wBznbEsmp0L09fPLDqe25fg=; b=OOa73+7U76P5GN+99OEG42xGhln3ej8j4NyuztlAk5Z+d0QsL2wvRrRsorKIZX3FsG UycKOUAaxJEfaWW/T8p1fz8fL6AKcDX8wY+SnFuPbwqXUaoLXhbML4mVLDMi0c8wU0Qz IrlNGtv49tzgcmSEvkyThVGqT2zUbwGCI8RHrxWQCx6nfEfeEDcXJbfq1gOjhNF88cQ1 NGHuhbl2ht8IqwVZKvXonUz51efsvSdOQAzEDd0Zkxbrv97CtDeOFYLagPmdo/Ypfnh5 c9r0PYAmtxrX7Yy+8LAFg3CkTrp2L4ZkTE6JRhoWQ/meTOTB/qUxcvPFbcgYb4lVTgGO u4ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX1caksCNYxcAQZY0J+U0fQWmDvAbjFTT4Gz9GPeSGvIUoN20z3 1MNRi1NK4M59fKBgC3OOSmwkdw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyI73MG/ZIAOZnzZtzL8QiW489qKJIAZOar/vQGWTW5lA9+aj7ZeYVmXm9FNwZj5YYLd8YyJA==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3f86:: with SMTP id d6mr7391018qtk.346.1566601499838; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.59] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i25sm2002020qki.49.2019.08.23.16.04.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <948CBC8F-4F25-4DE9-B360-31BF027647C0@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BDA7FD19-FFD4-4C7E-9391-5610CCD69140"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3578.1\))
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:04:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKmbwK7v8V5a0jCr4J+urDH57WSEvZGMggCZ9ew=ZKZzg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <119AA1A0-86AB-4757-8B15-E36822A3C6FF@gmail.com> <20190818182935.F172A87452C@ary.qy> <CAHw9_iK1aMZduMuyji0jYr96sLuun-yE3a8sccdmiQ85smr57A@mail.gmail.com> <756FFFA3-6153-4490-8472-BD89EA85CF40@hopcount.ca> <CAHw9_iKmbwK7v8V5a0jCr4J+urDH57WSEvZGMggCZ9ew=ZKZzg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3578.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ia8amW2f1IR6I6zbj2p506SQ5NU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review and provide feedback -- draft-stw-6761ext
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 23:05:03 -0000

On Aug 23, 2019, at 6:35 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> There was also some discussions with Jacob (or perhaps Alec) saying
> that if this had existed when they started, they probably would have
> used onion.alt instead of .onion.

This wouldn’t have solved the problem.  Remember that the driving concern behind the .onion standardization effort was that they needed a stable allocation from IANA so that they could continue to get PKI certs signed.

I know that nobody wants to be in the business of vetting proposed names for allocation, but there is no way around this.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email