IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Tue, 19 May 2015 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2728F1B2D32 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQ_YzZaKum-q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.nic.br [200.160.4.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB501B2D30 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4439710009B; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:15:25 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.nic.br
Authentication-Results: mail.nic.br (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.br
Received: from mail.nic.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nic.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3eRQTr6yScC; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:15:24 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (unknown [177.138.90.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9F52107444; Mon, 18 May 2015 23:15:23 -0300 (BRT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.2.0 mail.nic.br C9F52107444
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.br; s=dkim; t=1432001723; bh=O/vuQFH5Re2BSQtGk9ungz6MS84/me9JaI80Sz7HMt0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=f7InvXhG2kGSBnmWKnzReMa1TQbeongK0V8tdKU4fLcpwcc2vC5dCCyvLrXNfnufx VbFfeHrr2Mqn131pwHQIwnPyG4AlFe8CITZliCV7EYW+AmBSgk1Vrx/oPgbyaxz9Wd W9tCV+MW+jPs0t02S/gUEfk6+D+NfQdep3a+Tc8Y=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
In-Reply-To: <20150518235007.6BCCC2E85E37@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:15:21 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1A3D420A-32CC-464F-ADA5-401A9DC7656C@nic.br>
References: <20150517225142.52161.qmail@ary.lan> <55591F2D.4090309@redbarn.org> <36BA3DB9-A565-49E7-8850-8151B2940830@shinkuro.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505181011370.9602@ary.lan> <D17F9846.5796C%francisco.arias@icann.org> <20150518235007.6BCCC2E85E37@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iijgD77nsSLZdAWm-hk9XwRI8dU>
Cc: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 02:15:29 -0000

Besides ccTLD, out of ICANN contractual reach, looks like TLDs from Uniregistry (including ISC servers) and Neustar are the ones most mentioned here. Any outreach attempt, successful or otherwise, with Uniregistry, ISC and Neustar ?


Rubens

> On May 18, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Can we get DNS and EDNS Protocol Compliance added to the acceptance
> criteria for nameservers for TLDs.
> 
> http://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/tld-report.html
> 
> shows this is NOT happening.  It isn't hard to test for.  Eight dig
> queries per server is all that was required to generate this report.
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email