Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)

Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com> Fri, 09 August 2019 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew@depht.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9AD12008F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKcnXlck-Mvz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com (mail-wm1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5092112007C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id z23so5856355wmf.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=depht-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=hGnYIBmtchTMuSxamtVsGevK4JvTj/dZ5LzB54t50kg=; b=cdNACOJYzg4Kfaa09C1yiXHeYDBi2/xAMKwLyR5RhwDd3Gcg1Td4aP5FoOkJF8wvBm l65/wm9XKbULoqj2LklPdyBWlueHqQXymmHZvU9PdcJ9EoGPIqZRYbbS6A0j2h7EYIVt z5rhIeidbpv97SI0YUBc5j/t58Bwg6vsVZIuXMCIxWFumd+9HDV9qWj0rZSTbxjgm9Fg emmJ7/K++s+dKwuCrDyKeNvCIuDkElHVj41F7hrYjrzQjlUyXsP05QuR+NrZ3bFPsdni 6SgNzUYFQj1PeNhpJ60tOLCrdxqPiPqgULE9tywKySChLjgP/Glf0cRD43rAQtrWppLd Y+eQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=hGnYIBmtchTMuSxamtVsGevK4JvTj/dZ5LzB54t50kg=; b=Y0eCtcWJwICPqXa2mWYLutr/hwJeSlCINzIWjXFy1JXqNgmxpON3KUbJAzDucmNph0 m52KHoTh8LX61gzFC7Wb5/koQva5B5n2Zsfc6tMpOEnn7PhuX2VjmSJJ/kUMzdAFv1x3 uCSUqWW6nLJyUES/tvOtxhABorief1rpj4LRlTqKpnTAYtV5voQ3FbLEMkED9J3W96fr bC7+zoB4rtNchdvm/KN36SSkh72XaspHQMQT7HWdbrPYmB6keWjcW00L/sKrGXSu7T/C q8WHuGDR9NK/RAaxpG0JGY2EF30mpBT7AtOkhV/0BMB4aRgui9EhRlYB1M1mJDOTiBSe MxKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwoaz6oBSl+AOBuFggCctmLYHXUBaz7kcG3G9Ddq2q1GM6BsjF dzvYAjQf0FkOJt3AbN2DyXtKBEU8eom+KA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyspP+H86tVRqJLyw2aZKttX6IOOusOtQu63BlAdFf+Z9OVT4EL72SJADiTvVbVf17Ui61cZg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:24cf:: with SMTP id 15mr6293243wmu.76.1565361951564; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ANMC-6967.local ([2a02:a212:9285:29f0:50df:9b:9edd:faba]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v124sm9294539wmf.23.2019.08.09.07.45.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 07:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ray@isc.org, cheshire@apple.com, sara@sinodun.com, mellon@fugue.com, pusateri@bangj.com, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, suzworldwide@gmail.com, tjw.ietf@gmail.com, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20190809084729.4A3CDB80B92@rfc-editor.org> <BDCD75E6-32A7-4E4A-A00A-1261FC2E9519@sinodun.com>
From: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
Message-ID: <5cbcd020-2a32-ea61-998e-d098641cbfeb@depht.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 16:45:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BDCD75E6-32A7-4E4A-A00A-1261FC2E9519@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ivdor4IPjo6VTMcjB6s2trx6ZHw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8490 (5804)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:45:55 -0000

This looks to be a bug with the data tracker. I've sent mail to 
datatracker-project@ietf.org asking them to open a bug.

I believe this errata can be closed.

--Andrew

On 8/9/19 11:10, John Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a quick look, I can see that the data tracker is incorrectly saying Updated by RFC7766 but the document does not say that.
>
> regards
> John
>
> On 9 Aug 2019, at 9:47, RFC Errata System wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8490,
>> "DNS Stateful Operations".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5804
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
>>
>> Section: GLOBAL
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> RFC8490 states that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> I believe RFC8490 is not updated by RFC7766.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> I'm not sure if this actually errata, but it should be fixed regardless. The data tracker page for RFC8490 state that it is both 'Updated By' and 'Updates' RFC7766.
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8490/
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8490
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8490 (draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-20)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : DNS Stateful Operations
>> Publication Date    : March 2019
>> Author(s)           : R. Bellis, S. Cheshire, J. Dickinson, S. Dickinson, T. Lemon, T. Pusateri
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Domain Name System Operations
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> John Dickinson
>
> https://sinodun.com
>
> Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> Magdalen Centre
> Oxford Science Park
> Robert Robinson Avenue
> Oxford OX4 4GA
> U.K.