IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] .arpa

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 23 March 2017 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFFB129B66 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0MpGZp-Nkcg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1026129407 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x35so182840250qtc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=aLSEi/4ojCGkuKOkw8t0LduCTU3/AgjDGpOwqVUbHI8=; b=SQgGT1EbHrKIavySJssf51yNJMWk5ytAjrhdEVuVn0qS8nvZ+IW0Y7fyPetc83jcrz NKlM1bCHOWRSZZo5Icryn/fae1yEWEB3rgwTUFVHPHfJ1xtz6RST7pb3vX96+HNtaX1Y M0y1VnwwwYwUiN4EXPRuSPlIrHD2ZsRXwrlEM3L5F7rHPO+TdXToVjvLohVd7he3uLOX hZllj94fhSXRynDZp0JMqQ5BKqeGGpJCMu5ntIzDGEj90q6KnCOz6YfEXwF04R/ARsoZ azlO0oBQP9OpVS3GGzrrSiAjJDFZ/svH3FZ+WiywtW9mAZDpQt5SE5aNenDwa2CASS4a mP4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=aLSEi/4ojCGkuKOkw8t0LduCTU3/AgjDGpOwqVUbHI8=; b=rgnfBMIz37nSZo3abz4AYAI2hb833vPEONcGaAT+TXhNL1u9lJb8uzsk2fDSbnzbFG PHG6caiPUB/0Xh382gV1l4JlxMu1pv7f4LU6TVOuHpgCgqoPnLurCRGdPeAe6lE8t/5u uJWMuF16CDdMqbdolJLdfEXBeODnR9YpzMs/P5BSqHyfUaGRix5zrNYLzsuHvzkhIPvU PSQQYY7Y/5qvpg+tlRl/ILsQ+bvepi+50qhBrkeJ5Kb64HNP0BeIk1fZKGXXkjNC2zO+ 3DIHVw20nhA9Yektde9hJfeujBspu+7RtMv9e3VrBKapuk3ojZGDhqqjYGnBSB+r+6Nc Z9Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0FM4M+Y4uKFjjbQS3qbo15syPtQsr03kysWdfMlZWMxXYSbiYibXeux6uFvKgp4Q==
X-Received: by 10.200.43.17 with SMTP id 17mr3515517qtu.199.1490293857932; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.202] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e16sm3759461qkj.64.2017.03.23.11.30.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <F5854071-6507-444B-90DB-B0CF0C27B7D0@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08AA6585-2114-4DBD-953A-FD4B853D99BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:30:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <360B2807-049F-4707-95FE-AA279C583884@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, dnsop@ietf.org
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <20170323042741.79108.qmail@ary.lan> <2C6B4EB6-D0F0-44A8-95E4-68DF32244639@fugue.com> <20170323163205.GD19105@mx4.yitter.info> <500af1ed-5425-4452-ad8e-c2d511ee738d@bellis.me.uk> <850A8729-8762-4375-90EF-50CDF4AC232E@gmail.com> <47548136-78d7-8c53-462e-62439d6194ac@bellis.me.uk> <360B2807-049F-4707-95FE-AA279C583884@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/j46zpsftDMRROds98Cg4gSbBk_8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:31:01 -0000

On Mar 23, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> No snark intended, but if "the protocol" were really just DNS, we wouldn't be having this discussion.  Rather, it is the DNS wire protocol using a local resolution context rather than the root zone.  In any event, yes, the locally server homenet zone can function with DNSSEC.

So do locally-served zones, by this definition, use a different protocol?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email