Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 21 March 2017 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BA41294A0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4GCaMhEft3f for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BCA12949E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vnZWS27GGzCGd; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:12:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1490105524; bh=D3zlnrp4MffjIBM3WOMofhaV+BxT3eWjZlPn6Zksli4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HPQ9KYO8yK6VPiG6c5vQv72oTo+KUqarkk022oxuRU3SyZKWefUlz+6qhCwLhp02J KGSQIYLxF2Xw3aHbTro0h1+2tKIOU5XNAmzXOta0vN9VFec2XUzynK26EsPsCA//0/ 7Y8e3gjTVjiRPM/Rkkkqq2UrgHzliQLCCjYSJtIg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hAhH4Ved-3vx; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:12:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:12:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96175353868; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 96175353868
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1184144902; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-2@u-1.phicoh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703211011170.30281@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/j6Me8O5X5-N4w2dVwC-FdI71U-w>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:12:07 -0000

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Ralph Droms wrote:

> If draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03 specified homenet.arpa, the IETF could assign as many different names as wanted for different scoping scenarios, without interacting with ICANN for each assignment.

arpa is a loaded name for some non-US citizens.

localnet.ietf ? :P

Paul