Re: [DNSOP] draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 17 November 2020 21:21 UTC
Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED63A03F1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:21:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8uqwbfYkSUKP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:21:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B723A03C9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:48454) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1kf8Q3-000u5n-ka (Exim 4.92.3) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:21:43 +0000
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:21:43 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <52b356d0-28aa-2b5c-c1d1-3178c50beb51@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011172106100.9850@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <52b356d0-28aa-2b5c-c1d1-3178c50beb51@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jAm_yCd5jyi6GJusHz7j34rcAQk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:21:48 -0000
Seems like a good idea to make this more consistent. A correction for the first paragraph: change DNSSEC is primarily described in [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and [RFC4035]. DNSSEC commonly uses two resource records beyond those defined in RFC 4034: DS [RFC3658] and NSEC3 [RFC5155]. to DNSSEC is primarily described in [RFC4033], [RFC4034], and [RFC4035]. DNSSEC commonly uses two resource records beyond those defined in RFC 4034: NSEC3 and NSEC3PARAM [RFC5155]. DS is specified in RFC 4034. I suppose it's OK to omit CDS and CDNSKEY sinec they don't have any separate IANA considerations :-) Is it possible to ask IANA to combine the registries a bit? I would prefer it if there were one page of DNS parameter assignments, or maybe two with a separate page for DNSSEC. At the moment there are: https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dns-parameters https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dnskey-flags https://www.ietf.org/assignments/dnssec-nsec3-parameters https://www.ietf.org/assignments/sig-alg-numbers And https://www.ietf.org/assignments/tsig-algorithm-names which is misfiled - it is not listed under the DNS heading at https://www.ietf.org/assignments/ Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ defend the right to speak, write, worship, associate, and vote freely
- [DNSOP] draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons Tony Finch