IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 31 October 2014 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B364D1A8744 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CY4tmb_P4zB1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4201A8758 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 04:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 88DD4280564; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:13:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84318280314; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:13:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A094C0087; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:13:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:13:09 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com>
Message-ID: <20141031111309.GD15826@nic.fr>
References: <7E9FF8A6-FA02-4819-BB75-94730C0A4DDB@vpnc.org> <20141030100235.GA11342@nic.fr> <FF7875D1-A029-40FB-A4B9-BEC552EA8F6E@cox.net> <49DEE35910F1A6438E9805F4DEBBA3070AD964DF@038-CH1MPN1-043.038d.mgd.msft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49DEE35910F1A6438E9805F4DEBBA3070AD964DF@038-CH1MPN1-043.038d.mgd.msft.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux jessie/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jFfr3YRg7fXGc2vQGNXUmJB9e5w
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:14:07 -0000

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 07:42:02PM +0000,
 Darcy Kevin (FCA) <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com> wrote 
 a message of 1087 lines which said:

> I too have been tempted to comment on the fact that there is no
> QNAME that is being "minimized" here (which would imply making it
> shorter; not the gist of the proposal at all).

I really do not understand you. With Qname minimisation, the Qname
*will* be shorter.

> If we're stuck on the term "minimization", make it clear that it's
> not the QNAME itself that's being "minimized",

-1

> but the actual number of query transactions being minimized.

-1

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status