[DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Mon, 27 September 2021 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34B03A03F1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKSjBYWUrtzs for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FAF53A03EF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id b20so83638534lfv.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x75Ohb6orNRrbVLmA1cw28KOukWHOmWPh3ysJ4/qKuU=; b=oAbJlPsvRyL6hGj/ryoPSDYDZ8nV7nL36qA9QEjMfRG3KQnlx0tFlK8bILk6DwHDGX ABMgpydAJHhKSfuEpYHbVLuZZQ7KSsiQKF3Hy6qoeWokPlhEqreB8BHw67LYpu7F7DFx oPRFSG7k9/6EF92UI4BI3ZYkoLMtWADZgNINcDxIMmJ+7Eqx0ZAV8Z2hXolp+GsjHXZ+ q2wWRMp8D2c9sd8gCo9pnAE8ojOgfqQYqWt8kIdCa7wy77cDEW0B+Msw53ju4xmByAo4 Ksj1ksztEOsRwNcNuOES8G+vzdXnlY/jxav4gl5S8E4LFsiu/sdfM/Hg4mKXdWOWfv7V KEMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x75Ohb6orNRrbVLmA1cw28KOukWHOmWPh3ysJ4/qKuU=; b=oiWcrQYXK5P5Xad+XxJvJOIwzXEYoqJmdeEiBtxfYAMCr6uNFPJdsXXuBqaGJrZQ60 reHvenVuXLeb40MfJJQkyKLyYZ9hqoEL5gJU9PWX4+kbBQWS5qFPGu0A1WX1vhtSxkd9 X5AdCNiPvW+sJwU9C3A4Hw96Cot1ICh5XHz7WRW7fBBCHsBPObHUhiQ+Satq/HC9GGTQ BJzmiVgqZXk+FbFx3nYF/sBFFPlqKbydWssyTcQJpAmtWlbOSHSCzM6IGkaUS2DF0LAG EEpkNf2Sf0cy+glSlqaDWdyvMY1h6I2aF6qPC4qO2cKwMlLN1hd4kXp30Ni42tgx+xl4 6POQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312s/Zz6/Nyu3FhHwwXLq+xqx02YzL3L3L0vYc8fAloiPWLm5Ff CFgU9398gJrRGdV/UYCPQrDwF1aYM7O+1XBBRwyRhdlj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw11F2vgnYvOP2zkRLbpCl4hJEjec6tbOiV02jgLuiiN+cDo6raMI6vR4KvfTwq+lilPDDvla7yPgRNAERIY+4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1096:: with SMTP id j22mr1830227lfg.441.1632777534186; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:18:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH1iCiqw=qBAzta0rzN3UfMNL4jZwieps9zTUqDfTqBF+HXFwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec287d05cd00a4b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jHiIozysk3XgUJH-jbP0Qaud9-Q>
Subject: [DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 21:18:58 -0000
In case anyone does not follow the ADD WG, or does not closely follow DPRIVE, there is a WG adoption call for an SVCB binding for DNS. There are two days left in that adoption call. I encourage folks to take a look and give feedback concerning where they think any such draft belongs (e.g. DNSOP in stead), plus on the draft's readiness and suitability. (My opinion is that there are use cases beyond those in ADD, and the right place to address the possibly conflicting requirements is DNSOP, and that the ADD WG should not adopt it.) Brian
- [DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] FYI: WG adoption of DNS binding in ADD Brian Dickson