Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE
Kevin Darcy <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com> Fri, 18 October 2019 15:30 UTC
Return-Path: <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D796120D20
for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=fcagroup-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ENRfxJpfJoG1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12170120CF5
for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id n26so7906583ioj.8
for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=fcagroup-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OGckG3KWh6LK+revZ8mtrP3uDGrCBqtOWe/9L61YRxM=;
b=D9HASiDYMQ7EzpBYpCcW+4qrpIQ2lMz1pvYudc6Sf9mJ93L/61F8LnH+iWnH5+rb2f
c0hXy8rmtIU7ouu42Rk7kTs6HZMFv11LluNwGIO0t+8JNe7ZJsMmc4NTpWVLAu9Rg4zd
6c4TIlnSwDyUqdLqNafXtraqamg4tFUaLeBoLQa0CRvuH3ijUZox2wppP6u+FxxgO6I7
irtjoV9qAOkRB56N1U8f42m3RxL4gq0zRMm3QCy9B2jeEzFvCw4FkZxFZJUMapwMKORi
Dh/BD6coj3Z9yywvCoUNgPEmYL5rM8qfAUch549Kkpa8KQOydBhE+20dOhpMQPGa31rI
GbHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OGckG3KWh6LK+revZ8mtrP3uDGrCBqtOWe/9L61YRxM=;
b=S1a+v/o1SluzXpRfijipjpWvHf0qo/w3B5ddue11+AvOTa1HjdorbknoxaZNt+qH6w
jYCKMC+LuBb1KNPyVLZRJpWYsQSpLzotQZzCfZ4gEDVQ58oDUrrlDHg+aIsh9wGoJJT6
LVxCtzM9CP9RtrW88kDFFzXSgujaVL4ZRYGK8K/0f2j3Y/MBosLGJzoPx2e4TVVo+H/T
QwA1lLcJbzEkECRfOC1f5MmbEzzcax3ILGAvKXFdeyZTmm2AGlVO2yAQSp1PHNFw0Fgu
/D3X2aon/gqexF2a3c9SVIuDDWYFTiTcWU218wQxd0EoHDnGk70vEHkxJYi1Q5MMSQdD
hQZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfQWZc+y1JGrYThPgQWK2r8C7QBUcjR2ML0GEpJuu6pdSzApJx
qcjB0jxjbZP7P4k4JW11B0f+cRVo8QN7KSsHJpUtVCze
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwT/vMh8HutG19h4ybID8FgVouwDYtb5VnTT0b6eqKrLWCkfULPRkeXI+0sNCW90CaK+ORAFzBI+Wsr8BBydXg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8d13:: with SMTP id p19mr8927415ioj.306.1571412605153;
Fri, 18 Oct 2019 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJE_bqcM1PvmwR-icgz4UJuwsV_21FGs615OmExvWmHCVZX4Jw@mail.gmail.com>
<F8B56E64-AC0A-441E-A9C9-56E4BF02238F@isc.org>
<CAJE_bqfBt+tohvCxOwdeK5uta4cicaUzEDASYkpADFgsyobK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<FEDDE742-64BB-446E-A0B7-0A04FED4B793@isc.org>
<CAAeHe+z4R6ch-WCW=Ed6D3aQpt9uyXLVNPyC1C9_x-hLDDCUfQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHe+z4R6ch-WCW=Ed6D3aQpt9uyXLVNPyC1C9_x-hLDDCUfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Darcy <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:29:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAeHe+w0MLuUT6MFoPSJOqsMkYO58BcKHqdfP4JnnuGFY8hhKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000020807905953102d6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jI9y2SwCFX9VkbNZpunTeiq2ayQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
<mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:30:13 -0000
[ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] Sorry, I misread the thread. I thought it was for all values in the SOA. RFC 1982 is specific to only the serial, not relevant to REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE. Not enough caffeine... - Kevin On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:28 AM Kevin Darcy <kevin.darcy@fcagroup.com> wrote: > [ Classification Level: PUBLIC ] > > Apologies if this sounds condescending, but I haven't seen RFC 1982 > mentioned in this thread so far. > > While that RFC may not be the last word on the acceptable values of > SOA.SERIAL, in normal operation, it does contain some advice on how to > effectuate (or avoid) a "reset" of a zone's serial. > > > - Kevin > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 7:49 PM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: > >> >> >> > On 18 Oct 2019, at 10:46 am, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote: >> > >> > At Fri, 18 Oct 2019 10:25:29 +1100, >> > Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: >> > >> > > > one obvious interpretation is that REFRESH/RETRY/EXPIRE are signed >> 32 >> > > > bit integers. >> > > >> > > They are all intervals. How do you have a negative interval? >> > >> > I actually didn't expect they can be negative. My main question is >> > whether values larger than 2^31-1 should be considered valid. >> >> Well they are in range. That said slaves can and do apply sanity >> checks to these values. Both too low and too high cause operational >> problems. >> >> Mark >> >> > -- >> > JINMEI, Tatuya >> >> -- >> Mark Andrews, ISC >> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >
- [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RETRY/E… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… Kevin Darcy
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] valid value range for SOA REFRESH/RET… Tony Finch