Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Mon, 22 February 2010 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E870B28C129 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:51:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DYPU--VSd6Fr for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:51:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.schlyter.se (trinitario.schlyter.se [195.47.254.10]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F18228C100 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:51:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [201.238.167.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roy) by mail.schlyter.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BABFA2D4AD; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:53:16 +0100 (MET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <201002220022.o1M0M3qR048760@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:53:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A8EB3AAE-0DA6-4C4E-B2D1-E548884F63D5@dnss.ec>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <8E6C64ED-A336-4E8B-996F-9FB471EB07C6@NLnetLabs.nl> <4B7FE58C.5030605@ogud.com> <20100220202751.GB54720@shinkuro.com> <20100220213133.GE2477@isc.org> <4B807DC0.9050807@ogud.com> <315AD36E-879A-4512-A6A8-B64372E3D3CF@sinodun.com> <201002220022.o1M0M3qR048760@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:51:25 -0000

On Feb 21, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:

>  NSEC3
> has a non zero false positive rate due to the fact that the names
> are hashed.

Are you going on again about the possibility of hash collisions is SHA-1? 

Roy