IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Mon, 02 December 2013 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638C01AE057 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:00:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKirlZPvgmq9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22c.google.com (mail-qa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0A51A802D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i13so4528220qae.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:00:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=kDV6DFrALbvjHWJ5JSxd5GWRgqcGaeholgGSuWWN8R8=; b=N6hhDuLF1EQCpzVI8JYlvfj6UEc/BSvXIqkXJl6Xn9cRMtJOrgU1Pta1OHHOfi8QcK DF2xSM7r79MRMCgelCtvPOEpdP9kLD1NPb5Feqx5Cmd0Myqb7MzLEK7C9iW62sGgzSWM xrgUWCkAiJsoGZutB/CYy4RaBYr4EF/YQewtc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=kDV6DFrALbvjHWJ5JSxd5GWRgqcGaeholgGSuWWN8R8=; b=ay+Xb1ZtSj3zWKIOLBQZ8OU3utYRZQuv0l7K+8HBYZrNNRTVmlyqb8IW1tuVlA1xN7 yv3/HcK4m+kWtYP3/mViO5FDiKQ4rKP7HgaCIApmXEaE5y9w85PGBw/ONVrSk2+ok1tG +gQJZfXFbLgJ1q5DtdVIzNrQjWWk5bb3OV7oQphE3TO6XrzD31Wqlv+fL/p5X/RrXb3V +PmCWFY7OGvMqoVd7WKriLgY5NmiWimh7onZa7Em5oCzYrv4AeTMydESZDAAVgmlSP6E z5w3UivCgXveN2HczyhEHWiCvz2C5hO2FUJbpAybaH0VZXhORYw0wGyC8lrdZNsUubIc R08w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDuxvGhOP51eF1cCajNxjwVWwMqKUjDl1fEjywZ7SxjmjsMv5IZ2YDd63gMmLj/U99xANS
X-Received: by 10.224.51.74 with SMTP id c10mr80404272qag.7.1386000032702; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [2001:4900:1042:1::] ([2001:4900:1042:1:81cf:ef9d:5ea3:5fd8]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm26475781qeb.4.2013.12.02.08.00.31 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:00:30 -0500
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org>
References: <20131201164841.GB12135@sources.org> <BF87877A-8989-4AA4-9ED1-52C82E1BC538@nominum.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312011206480.12923@bofh.nohats.ca> <20131202151651.GD16808@mx1.yitter.info> <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:00:38 -0000

On Monday 2 December 2013 at 10:38, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> SLDs under .arpa are cheap and easily managed by the IETF.

Yes.
> Forcing someone into a different class (where all sorts of things could block by accident) seems silly.
I don't know that anybody is talking about force. I'm not sure what that would look like, in fact, given that anybody is free to write software that does whatever they think is sensible.

But discarding the option of using a different class at an over-general high level seems silly, too. Don't the operational considerations depend on the details?

Saying that using a non-IN class is a non-starter seems about as silly as saying that using a non-IN class is always the right thing.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email