IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 19 February 2019 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35484130ECA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:27:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KT3As79sFGNJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:27:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E37130ED1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 04:27:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:38150) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gw4Ub-000kwZ-L6 (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:27:21 +0000
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:27:21 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <969D8BA1-6ED3-47E8-AFFD-2BEE8EA3E66B@bangj.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902191219070.766@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <155053239541.25848.12960190085730298684.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <969D8BA1-6ED3-47E8-AFFD-2BEE8EA3E66B@bangj.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jkzphg8Xn-PQT_icEQ6XTFc5o-E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:27:27 -0000

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>
> I think we have addressed all of the comments except for the Date format
> concern from Mark. That is still an outstanding issue.

The DNS currently has a couple of representations of absolute (POSIX
flavoured) time:

RRSIG, SIG, TKEY (32 bits with serial number arithmetic relative to now)

TSIG (48 bits)

It seems silly to invent a third one and prevent servers from re-using
code.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
the widest possible distribution of wealth

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status