Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Wed, 25 November 2015 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157E81B320D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HwwPi1Mlm33j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392EB1B320A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgcc31 with SMTP id c31so43061413qgc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eRVrKXUxJgVKOA5lb7h1HuIhFHb/QuTJu5caWVf4ZhI=; b=HF8ken4mE//RplQK2Nkgtjsqr32LvpT+V+mvrcfSLpZkajpiju+hVIws4CCMZlBw0T qYVZVmpANCwfjrV4PnPR/aApzDGqXlofi8NityeZVWNuhiZovEExXAUk50YifrNWGUwI LnSbIXMv7GaveEEjJp0dDvkUgrCfMm2pkrClo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eRVrKXUxJgVKOA5lb7h1HuIhFHb/QuTJu5caWVf4ZhI=; b=B5a27+fSPUHhM/6E0BYO/wKjFIBLe0LPVdRFp7DsXuiHVweUzejfMiw9HVRGFqrRev tlvkfsma1cnBpIeLlZy/38HQKz9bL8HtxBQDj6PPTimgiN+3Vfp62i8YJIibCO90PC1p uBo4hxCgb+KJEAMa1kgK3rWv14awgA2OrbeFLSdfXi/UGBqEZV0RXsNwmf4BrQSQ40EN KxPkBgUOe1I5M4DjPwOt/DssPs44tlBy63w7z4nXVB454SJBZb/xrrJtkWCitwdoMh3q syHx1XVHH99iVZDPtiPda14y4LT7KqEOaq6Bob16/73aKlT3yESkj/OAtTd4SY2rgCLG CqpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXE8MVlfwUsWl81csBbDCSmmPvSjC00P0X1o6Qj3hiyXvQ3TKlbxGR3e4Lq6HQ0s+BBvAf
X-Received: by 10.140.136.134 with SMTP id 128mr15045870qhi.16.1448491883135; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.81] (host217-42-117-84.range217-42.btcentralplus.com. [217.42.117.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j34sm6247046qkh.39.2015.11.25.14.51.21 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <20151112185822.20185.55205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:51:20 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0DE7C85E-C2F9-4569-BD5E-11896DB727D5@dnss.ec>
References: <20151112185822.20185.55205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jn3Un5WCCn4uGqdtLEZb1VEM2Zg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:51:26 -0000

I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG adoption.

Roy

> On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:58, IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state 
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop