[DNSOP] Update on Current Work

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 September 2016 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71EC12B2CC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VrZcjPprSBfC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8253712B231 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n143so51821529ita.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eHUO62nWCAxrAzYDaStM3Yn5nzcnFZgtrCNSwmkqOsA=; b=p6MWTvoa9rQ0mHlUgFHHwv0SPMHH5jxbJ7Ew1wKGKws77JgAgtgLvNkZiidbXyR12f jztsSTYHktVua3XnwfrFP/BU8gLr6MD3z7HQj6qWVygdYKYzOqcPuM8OaW/H/fXNzg+j kp73zZxUorbLnWQxGS26y2bX1B83PtFzle+UmMlvsu9hEhufCK5j2fUFP+lsLmJHubGc hLX95rAwsBLGWRVEyy5mFH4Xb5+MeIu6nAlPpjx1rWG5daoShdnpA+YzPlnUm3nB1z3c Jy6dMbaFvfMvAGwuBWqnr1IUTYFtcfl8sVlpOpu3/JbmVUGNVXp+BceNhOu0sa2L60ah fbVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eHUO62nWCAxrAzYDaStM3Yn5nzcnFZgtrCNSwmkqOsA=; b=CtNNheqExkuViFsuwUHXHBG7t7RF0qavlEdIUWlnfFSnMEZEcBqN7NO87j/gs8U3Mn Xj9TML7DeO8q0ciz9Z9fhUfIcdy1TFNtIsWYVVdX1JFvI120XfcXuJab0BmSV95xjkvS VO5xtFa5DmKlZ79uPuuGFaSdfCTSWtBejqJSPmKX5xPInNlIOlxGwgGfZFVWOgBB2GQg klr5Kw7CVE+IctK9O5d7OscnfcRU6K1l+SQ9LElH55gWEdyhJYqpikDN2ngjTl7IP8EG juVzQEWGkaKuACO6B01J6O6rGXSkCZ+LtAEHZog/ZgDZOPBVg669AORR4ck4dnAD7aCI ISTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOn5BpCDOXM6xFZBEd3ic71Em2eIgO0gSUd3sfh9duI0sjADofAKmQ8flF7Kk/XjsIHhjhDOlC8lnVGkg==
X-Received: by with SMTP id q184mr4699183itd.35.1474468022455; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:27:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EUsMfTS+WeO=gOyey2KiZrONFeqq=7vjtOH4xj4_JAFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c08bc7eb62c76053d0556b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jy_edm6rJ5y-iLhq9AX8v8iHA98>
Subject: [DNSOP] Update on Current Work
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:27:06 -0000


I wanted to give a quick update to the group on what work I have lined
up in our process queue, and to get people start thinking about
agenda items for Seoul, which is coming up in the next two months.

I will state right now that I've made the decision that we will *not*
be allowing any agenda time for the Special Names discussion (Unless,
of course there is no other work going on).  We should be able to work
this out (or not work this out) on the mailing list, and if need be,
have a virtual interim on it.

We have several drafts that are working toward Working Group Last
Call.   Currently, the drafts (and the general order) are:

# WGLC order

* draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any

* draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse

* draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag
    (I need to double check with the authors)

* draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
    (Dave needs to deliver a new version and perhaps
    another iteration.)

* draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue
    (We still outstanding issues)

# Other drafts

* draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal

    We had some good initial discussion right before adoption but we
    should revisit if there is interest. Mainly, I don't want the
    authors waiting until the document deadline to push changes...

* draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http

    This draft stirred up discussion in other groups, for better or
    worse.  A new mailing list was spun up to discuss the general idea
    of dns over http:


    Though my opinions are that this discussion (and possible work)
    should not interfere too much this draft moving forward.

(and all of this precludes the fact I'm not covering the Special Names

# New Work

    We have a few requests to have drafts adopted, and I have not
    spent any time looking at them. I will do that, and get
    back to the authors.

questions, comments, complaints, etc are welcome