Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF2129873 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPzL09yejvY8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.7bits.nl (shannon.7bits.nl [89.188.0.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966691297ED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 07:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:666:0:4835:5d5f:ecfb:87d3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter) by shannon.7bits.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B6C2C1B96; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:15:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:15:33 +0200
Message-ID: <2AC2A3DD-1454-4A30-A372-A0074B93CC14@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <129BED3E-6BB3-4960-B144-373A04F1AFD5@powerdns.com>
References: <22745.38650.113925.208670@gro.dd.org> <DB1F2A9F-1473-49D7-B0A0-FBD077B09CF9@powerdns.com> <3BE34823-E83C-4F9D-ABE1-35C61F9E2996@ogud.com> <22746.29861.99723.209867@gro.dd.org> <B8FE1E18-A11E-4C76-9C69-9E3354DB6B92@powerdns.com> <22746.54599.126962.148463@gro.dd.org> <129BED3E-6BB3-4960-B144-373A04F1AFD5@powerdns.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/k9vkADnmQoM247JW5kmDRlrqKDo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-tale-dnsop-edns-clientid
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:15:38 -0000

On 31 Mar 2017, at 16:09, Peter van Dijk wrote:

> On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:27, Dave Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Peter van Dijk writes:
>>> Please note that neither draft handles the use case of also passing 
>>> the
>>> port number, which in a world of growing CGN deployment, may soon 
>>> prove
>>> quite important.
>>
>> I agree that neither handles it explicitly.  Ray's singular use case
>> doesn't really need it, and our draft can handle ports through the 
>> DNS
>> address family mechanism if needed, albeit less compactly that could
>> be otherwise envisioned.  If this were something that others think
>> should somehow be made explicit via some other mechanism, I could see
>> incorporating that.
>
> How would you do it in the DNS address family?

Sorry, I see it now, the DNS address family has an opaque field 
(‘custom token’) behind it. Would prefer standardisation of port 
still!

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/