Re: [DNSOP] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 12 May 2022 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F271C159526; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMS3We1s_mCK; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BA63C14F739; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.9]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 91227223C3; Thu, 12 May 2022 09:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
References: <165231238057.25278.9656343880982302309@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 09:38:00 -0700
In-Reply-To: <165231238057.25278.9656343880982302309@ietfa.amsl.com> (John Scudder via Datatracker's message of "Wed, 11 May 2022 16:39:40 -0700")
Message-ID: <yblbkw2iu53.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kABramEZgov0863ARKHQkG9Chmc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 16:38:02 -0000

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes:

> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-08: No Objection

Thanks John; I've made all of these changes:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for this document, I found it easy to read and useful. I have only a few
> nits:
> 
> 1. In the Introduction: “This sacrifices the tamper-resistance proof of non-
>    existence offered by NSEC3”
> 
> That doesn’t parse. Probably what you mean is “This sacrifices the
> tamper-resistance of the proof of non-existence offered by NSEC3” (added “of
> the”)? Or "... the tamper-resistant proof" would also work.
> 
> 2. In Sections 2.4 and 3.1, I suggest “re-signing” (signing again) instead of
> “resigning” (quitting).
> 
> 3. Appendix B has “The table (Appendix C)
>    below”
> 
> The “(Appendix C)” part appears to be a mistake? The table is uncaptioned, I
> guess you either should caption it and xref that caption, or just remove the
> xref?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI