Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 13 November 2019 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84E712093A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:55:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5WtPjoYdK7h2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4AE1208A4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.200.2.180] (sdzac10-108-1-nat.nje.twosigma.com [8.2.105.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7140932C6DE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:55:11 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <yblzhgzhd8b.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:55:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-Id: <94DB2B7E-31E5-4D52-A8AA-F2354209F250@dukhovni.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FG7qzPnLkUH7mSBca=1NfXy6YduHD4UdmcfXFjD8xC6g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9_gVuwAEthi9HU2wdw+Vf+STCwvXr4wOB4PRD_Hej6JPPbuQ@mail.gmail.com> <yblr241z4s8.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CA+9_gVvqqKwrkM7WYuEGGzfy+DSm3TzwmCDXA+AyyQ3c0Hr8wg@mail.gmail.com> <yblzhgzhd8b.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kBneb_QeJM9nK3JTk86PTw3PKFI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:55:20 -0000


> On Nov 13, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>; wrote:
> 
> I added this text to the next version:
> 
>      <t>When the response grows beyond the requestor's UDP payload
>      size <xref target="RFC6891" />, servers SHOULD truncate messages
>      by dropping EDE options before dropping other data from
>      packets.  Implementations SHOULD set the truncation bit when
>      dropping EDE options.</t>

Are you sure that setting TC=1 when EDE doesn't fit is the right
trade-off?  I'm somewhat skeptical...

-- 
	Viktor.