Re: [DNSOP] .arpa

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Thu, 23 March 2017 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E01129B1B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LK5br8qYSi_U for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CBE11296BE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-wifi-246.sql1.isc.org ([149.20.50.246]:64374) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1cr79I-0004Y5-77 (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:07:48 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20170323042741.79108.qmail@ary.lan> <2C6B4EB6-D0F0-44A8-95E4-68DF32244639@fugue.com> <20170323163205.GD19105@mx4.yitter.info> <500af1ed-5425-4452-ad8e-c2d511ee738d@bellis.me.uk> <850A8729-8762-4375-90EF-50CDF4AC232E@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231351490.2262@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <a6e98737-b426-a67b-efe7-3603c531afcb@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:07:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231351490.2262@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kOCNcK2YI4Jb3ITNgvBRbd8q-2Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:07:53 -0000


On 23/03/2017 11:03, Paul Wouters wrote:

> The phrase "more important" is pretty meaningless. And as was indicated,
> it is all based on the levels of DNSSEC deployment on stubs, which could
> change dramatically if one phone vender would suddently enable
> validation or default to DNS-over-TLS to 8.8.8.8.

To be fair, if they did _only_ the latter then the .homenet names would
never resolve anyway...

Ray