IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Thu, 24 April 2025 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F9A207FA5B for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upANuIv4GBDx for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD28B207FA56 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6f0cfbe2042so10213816d6.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; t=1745484927; x=1746089727; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:in-reply-to :from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zsM9tYlBrUCust7CvNdpWYy7Mev86e9RWvplQluU3qo=; b=LYDo+HFK3Lh4a0yJA6s0zegVKjopn/v2seUHe1GciRhzu9CxGg50dRI48rdKmGkg2o r0/VfQjYQ1Un+jpZaUAF+xJI3DJxTMfcZo3o7KNT9F+pBnfuGKm6dKEGH+PZjZVEmufX Mj+WO/TpueG4ioRsck2CcsRTMcjS0dDl1xUyI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1745484927; x=1746089727; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:date:in-reply-to :from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zsM9tYlBrUCust7CvNdpWYy7Mev86e9RWvplQluU3qo=; b=Q3hD9IIIReLqqcwRhVEjm7eY751Y9+hhOSH3rBSoj7Colf+yitU2kuDtGkPJleU3Fj ljt3rPFUpaaBZa8i9GNyhfZKM7ai9Om00VtHOlhJjbzzmLc0V+aDaW7GyX2GN5Bgm/4x mJWWwZueOVG04Eunj0SEFS9slZr2My+WPanrdjuHbKdgeJOJr3IfrBv72h2uNDRSqY9b xXgA5Rk19DszlsOYvre5XPysrapp+YqAztcVXsRF1pqebvz5gS+mjK1LIaZl3AU8FEqF A+8LKM7/b+nQneC3MpEyVBSmfj2woeHWOFBSsSuUGnDTJIS/0dkAnjERGp+HoKluaAb9 4dVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxWFjlOB0HbQeuBjE/006uZH90B+NIN9Pxzc6w0ZHlL8JgpLBmH O6oLQQa/kb/IUXr1/s9inG/2Ff4BCZJMfh2R3uOixBKKybBcIZOpURIPDo7+FRI5OH6SJe7SXIm 0S8g=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncui1xIx4zCnSeF3RZ9fVE/l542phd8I/L09FPF9YrMDo1MRHVlSlrnHWCxFp1m EahsIj/L7WESPpuW3rikWzz7OmTdsGWa4r4jWeTsjnE3RX4etRoxW0MTdDklquw2w9Ex5DmBxSL K8FopTCcHOz3Gs5KizndqgCDPt/U7PWCSp74CWMUjYpj7IxLwTgS51L6ju4jiGkeeDFl2TntjYY q4/YncqAauQ8CX+vwyhQqtMb0+p5Bgu/2mxBozg0PXQmH2vtyukiKK27Yu2s5EDD2Cd86cRrNbI JNZeojS6DeDak+lyK3Y7GV+zLkzEPg8UoXebmAol9JLFgA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHTDlhhbqPGDBXWv2O0yVcklKGyOkzif1g33SlG/hldfXNz98OZ/qDk2TvWx0xyJjnenQsz6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20eb:b0:6f0:e2d3:d812 with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6f4c11f1af0mr22432316d6.18.1745484927125; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([88.81.146.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-47e9eaf4873sm9249131cf.1.2025.04.24.01.55.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Apr 2025 01:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.500.181.1.5\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <20250423220623.81B22C6078DB@ary.qy>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:55:14 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D4F4E969-5890-44E7-8ED2-714A5DDDD261@dnss.ec>
References: <m1u5h1G-0000LcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <83666fd3-a51f-46e1-a5ac-0b9a46361480@desec.io> <49E3B1B6-E960-4A46-9C5D-2721FD57132D@depht.com> <3b5fb9e7-8a2b-420f-a2fb-dd6f6a0b88ae@isc.org> <89047B78-A2B1-43F2-A996-94DF1E90538A@depht.com> <cc84f69c-c349-4d91-b942-80221b564a9b@isc.org> <ac48e27d-479f-42f3-b87f-891220ef2fe8@app.fastmail.com> <BE721880-6254-48F4-9F91-567A99E0511B@icann.org> <m1u7asT-0000MtC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <BB8275F1-538D-46B0-BFFA-F561A583EBFF@rfc1035.com> <39E139A3-A903-4D1E-BB5D-31368EF5C8B9@icann.org> <20250423220623.81B22C6078DB@ary.qy>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.500.181.1.5)
Message-ID-Hash: OCFH7UREW7CVJEYSVNK5EH4T4RTAL6IL
X-Message-ID-Hash: OCFH7UREW7CVJEYSVNK5EH4T4RTAL6IL
X-MailFrom: roy@dnss.ec
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kP7JcWWekeYL_rEabMTZm38w8o4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>


> On 23 Apr 2025, at 23:06, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> It appears that Paul Hoffman  <paul.hoffman@icann.org> said:
>> On Apr 23, 2025, at 09:07, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
>>> ICANN already has its own list/registry of TLD strings it will never delegate: .home, .corp, .mail, etc.
>> 
>> I'm 99% sure that there is no policy statement about "will never delegate" for .home, .corp, and .mail, but I could be wrong. I'm interested in any references to something
>> official here that says "never", for many reasons.
> 
> There are 43 two letter "user assigned" ISO 3166 codes that will never be
> assigned to geographic places, so I think it is safe to assume they will never
> be TLDs.

Ack: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use-tld/01/

Roy

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status