IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] why did SRV care to avoid conflicts

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 27 March 2018 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F05127871 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RnGLwc9ffmH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A8B126BF7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:4ca8:bd4c:848b:7427] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:4ca8:bd4c:848b:7427]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 912587594C; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5AB992B5.1070600@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:39:17 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.24 (Windows/20180302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
CC: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <5AB96F3C.4090204@redbarn.org> <A400D2A3-3866-4EE3-879B-479991581502@isc.org> <265EBB42-4042-40BE-88C5-F3FEB6540DA6@isc.org> <5AB97728.70202@redbarn.org> <23B89A43-06D8-48B3-B8AD-7DAA3A5FD9A9@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <23B89A43-06D8-48B3-B8AD-7DAA3A5FD9A9@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kT92ti5EO_wyVDUmmlaNuiQXBTA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] why did SRV care to avoid conflicts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:39:22 -0000


Mark Andrews wrote:
> COM and the root for that matter still potentially need to advertise services associated with their roll of being a registry.
>
> e.g. _whois._tcp.com

ah! ok.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email