Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] A nudge on the new terms in draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis

Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rgibson@dyn.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C83129436 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dyn.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-9GoCPy2rUb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x248.google.com (mail-vk0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1460129455 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x248.google.com with SMTP id k127so76936975vke.7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dyn.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jgG67VBL1BMiTSlVKTo8JmKB9o3W9zcapXFA2j3uXFc=; b=rh5KSQudZJNCu9nJSwhc8ThxB2b/jTwmTW8PvDKlicIdU+p0bENplxIrOldUTmCHUR mL/e6Xt7qHqRZ0VJZoLK8J2reHg4XMX6wxd8a2aAgI04GfpKyboGU58MVJR7nyqR9VpZ V/gwPgYkRoWQqp9F58H1tYS5kFi5z+28EMIUg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jgG67VBL1BMiTSlVKTo8JmKB9o3W9zcapXFA2j3uXFc=; b=tIosShd8xxek5Y2soWtWAmPoeFU4mbMSUWqAA8y8xSttyr6da2c9MgfSgYdJx9HnuX 0viaS0LobsccRwf0WSfcrwLbszxlMjor92uh6Kzre++N/U9K2HhAMjRJpt7DU11GvXlO D7KSVZMUu2i0eZGFIT9u2bVBJBIgHiE+GTNB4RELlHrhTvRnLC///F1VczdZKeMKpwKf 2fS1i+RCXsRe4b5zOkRiFHzW8KKQcUc9yb6h1A7gx3Hv0TBmqFg7ylrVYFKEFabKpAkO u9mRDh5nD70ZCq4lkgc6ztB/qeramdIAapLMoLsvDokPe1blrGjmT4AXiPVIQblwWhnR YJgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lQ3YwH2Ks8xJ4KNovxmjX6p77vWJDJsO7bWGYHMx2ANY2M4ZK7uYmNFiD47HXbmzUm6etQUo1wlfjVZTo9
X-Received: by 10.176.81.234 with SMTP id h39mr13948349uaa.83.1487030088833; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.131 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:54:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170213233435.GF24579@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <390DDFE7-E70F-4E4E-96AB-AECFE25672E0@vpnc.org> <310D014B-1B3F-420C-A411-DEF6A67016D5@icann.org> <20170213233435.GF24579@mournblade.imrryr.org>
From: Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:54:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC94RYZEzVW7Lr1php-+c+8H8eqfVr1JPUakEnqaP=XBgJ439w@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c19204c37afd60548722c51
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kTF6Oi2pEMAEWG3oqyE-Pp4GQF4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] A nudge on the new terms in draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:54:51 -0000

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
wrote:

> My beef
> would be with the "zero or more" part, as applied to labels, since
> zero length labels (if construed as actual labels rather than just
> termination sentinels) do not occur except to terminate a domain
> name.  Otherwise, if the zero length terminator is a label, then
> domains have at least one (terminal zero-length) label.
>

https://github.com/DNSOP/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/issues/6